Feb 4, 2009, News Report
"We need tougher federal laws, but action at the state level can halt gun violence and pave the way for common sense federal gun laws." -- Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign
Most states have weak or non-existent gun laws that help feed the illegal gun market, allow the sale of guns without Brady background checks and put families and children at risk, according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. But according to a release from the group, more states are pushing legislation to strengthen their gun laws. The organization's 2008 state scorecards, which rate each state on the strength of its gun laws, are being released today for all 50 states.
"Once again, the scores for most states are abysmal. Most people don't realize how few laws we have on the books restricting easy access to guns. As a result, we continue to make it too easy for dangerous people to get dangerous weapons," says Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign. "We need tougher federal laws, but action at the state level can halt gun violence and pave the way for common sense federal gun laws."
No states got a better score for 2008 than for 2007. Five states saw their scores drop: Florida, Georgia and Louisiana for passing laws forcing employers to allow employees to bring guns into workplace parking lots, and two states, West Virginia and Wyoming, for passing so-called "Shoot First" laws that authorize deadly force in public against a perceived threat even if ways to avoid the threat are available.
The scores range from a mere two points out of a hundred -- in Kentucky, Louisiana and Oklahoma -- to a score of 79 for California. Other high scores include those for Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland and New York.
The Brady Campaign says it is seeing a marked increase in the number of states pushing for stronger gun laws. State lawmakers across the country are ramping up efforts to pass new legislation on gun violence prevention, following nearly a decade during which gun advocates dominated state houses. Much of the proposed legislation focuses on cutting off easy gun access to convicted criminals and the dangerously mentally ill and on improving methods to trace guns used in crimes.
Last year, the Brady Center identified 52 bills it considers a priority for passage in 22 states, compared with 30 such bills two years ago. The Brady Campaign says it expects even more states to make the push for stronger gun laws during 2009 state legislative sessions. In sharp contrast, said the group, the gun lobby proposals to force guns on college campuses and in the workplace are being met with limited or little success.
Weak state gun laws create a dangerous combination of risk, said the release: they don't require Brady background checks for every gun purchase and they don't take other actions to effectively combat gun trafficking. For example, states like Arizona, Kansas, Florida, Missouri and Texas don't check the background of every gun purchaser, thus making it easier for felons and other prohibited purchasers to get guns, and they also have no laws on the books to effectively combat trafficking in illegal guns. As a result, they make it a lot easier for dangerous people to access guns.
WHRead real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.
View All Industry Solutions
Comments
Why the heck would you get on this bandwagon??? What does this have to do with Technology?? I will be canceling my subscription immediately just because of this one sided piece of garbage.
I live in Fl and know from experience that whenever a firearm is bought from a dealer, the buyer is run through FDLE for any criminal record or injunctions which would prohibit the person from buying a firearm. God forbid that the facts get in the way of a sensational headline. Remember that once the 2nd goes, the rest are not far behind. You can't cherry pick ammendments...well you can if you're the press and the BB.
It is dismal that the Brady campaign can offer their distorted views unchallenged. There are more than 10,000 various laws on the books already relate to gun ownership. The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the Second Amendment is a Constitutionally protected right. Please do not support or entertain those who choose to distort facts and villify lawful gunowners.
The depth of this blatantly ideological/political, devoid of technological enlightenment article, calls into question suspected 'slants' to any/all succeeding articles and attenuates some past ones. It's lose/lose.
I'm a new subscriber, so I don't have a good feel for what Government Technology usually reports. I had hoped to see how state or local govts like mine (TN), had used their electronic "instant background check" to catch more "bad guys" or "free up" enforcement personnel or even save taxpayer dollars. Instead I got a re-print of a anti-gun report from the "Brady Campaign". I'm sure the "NRA" has reports that state just the opposite...its what they both do. The point being, this article didn't mention anything related to technology advances in supporting government solutions. I'm trying out you guys to see how and where govt's are leveraging IT so please stay on target (bad pun intended) and give me info I can use.
Brady law needs to lobby stiffer penaltys for gun crimes! Not penaltys for law abiding citizens. make prisoners work cleaning roads ect.. not watching cable tv and playing on the intenet.
How can you publish this uninformed nonsense? Only the vehement anti gun Brady campaign would rate California as the "safest" gun controlled state- do they not realize that one is more llikely to be murdered there except for Washington, D.C.-another of the Brady listed "safe" states! Just another example of eliteist garbage!
Latest Government Technology News