Government Technology
Government Technology: State & Local Government News Articles Follow us on

The Push for a Real, No-Hype National Broadband Strategy

Bookmark and Share
Comment

Connection Speed

Jun 17, 2009, By Indrajit Basu

World-class broadband speeds aren't just something leading-edge computer geeks dream about. Fast broadband interconnectivity lies at the heart of American business and agricultural competitiveness. Fortunately the Obama administration clearly sees a comprehensive U.S. national broadband strategy as a federal government priority.

President Barack Obama's first major push to build a high-speed Internet superhighway across America in the form of the $7.2 billion stimulus funding announced in February may be considered insufficient by many. But Michael Copps, acting chairman of the FCC, said whatever has been announced so far is just the beginning; America can expect more doses of impetus coming from the Obama administration that will ultimately connect every citizen to broadband.

Speaking at the International Telecommunication Union's World Telecommunication Policy Forum -- a high-level international meeting to exchange views on key policy issues held on April 21 in Lisbon, Portugal -- Copps said the Obama administration is committed to every American citizen in the broadband plan that's still under formulation.

Copps admitted that the government is fully aware that America is falling behind many developing countries in its broadband reach.

"If you go back in the course of our history, we have always managed to figure out that role with active participation of the public sector and private sector in the early days of building turnpikes, bridges and railroads, rural electricity and basic telecom. The government has always found a way to do all those things," he said.

"Somehow over the course of several years, we got away from that, but we need to go back in the past, and that's what we are doing now," he added.

According to Copps, although the American government was involved in planning infrastructure for the last eight years, there was no conscious effort to provide a stimulus because the general feeling was that somehow the magic of the marketplace would get everything done.

"But that did not really happen," he said, "and that's why we find ourselves where we are in the present comparative broadband rankings among the nations of the world."

However, he said, that state of affairs has changed. "We have a new government and we have an American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that carves out a very active role for the government," Copps said. "This administration is a believer that the government has a central role to play in promoting infrastructure."

"Part of that is the stimulus of the $7.2 billion for broadband. But that is short-term stimulus. I call that the down payment," Copps said.

He emphasized the federal government's resolve to roll out a broadband plan. "In the long term, there is a commitment to formulating a strategy to get broadband to all of our citizens, and the FCC has been put at the center of this and instructed within the next 10 months to come up with a national broadband plan," he said.

And that will lead to a new plan, said Copps, as well as a longer-term investment and investment stimulus. "So the role of the government is growing, and it is not just on the economic side, but I think we will see a really proactive effort here to make this process open and transparent," Copps said.

Clarifying the doubts some have about whether the new broadband plan would include all sectors of American society, Copps said, "As we develop the national [broadband] plan we will be talking not only to the business and people, but also what I call nontraditional stakeholders


Comments

By South Carolina Broadband proponent on Jun 24, 2009

The argument that rural citizens must pay the price for not having connectivity is somewhat like saying, we shouldn't spend money to pave roads to rural areas. The commentor is correct, it is not profitible at present to serve less populated areas, however one forgets that we are in an information based society. The "virtual highway" broadband can provide is just as important to our economy and security as was the Interstate System of highways that was begun a half century ago. Wake up, the rest of the world is leaving us behind.

By Kim on Jun 18, 2009

I disagree with Mark's comment about location. A national broadband strategy isn't about rural dwellers having a faster personal internet speed. It's about national broadband penetration, a measure of economic health of which the US is globally sinking farther and farther behind. As with electricity and telco, it is a matter of increasing the effeciency of our country overall.

By Tom on Jun 2, 2009

While the $7.2 billion in the stimulus package for broadband deployment is a significant investment, the government can't go it alone. Over the past two years, our nation's nearly 1,400 broadband providers have invested nearly $120 billion to extend the capacity of our nation's high-speed Internet infrastructure. In fact, if you total the annual government investment (in today's dollars) in putting a man on the moon and building the Interstate Highway system, you will not have matched what broadband providers will invest this year alone in the nation's broadband capacity. We need policies that promote this robust private investment and constructive public-private efforts to reach remote unserved areas.

By Mark on May 29, 2009

OK, speaking of no hype. The $7.2 billion will go mainly the IOCs who serve these rural areas, right? Which means we are providing free capital for the IOCs to do what was too expensive for them to make a business of in the first place. Wonderful...Rural people, you live in the country because there are benefits over the city, correct? This also means there are disadvantages on the flip side (such as reduced connectivity). We city-dwellers would love to have open fields, fresh produce 100 feet away, and low crime rates--but we accept these are the downsides of city living. Satellite Internet and TV is completely acceptable and affordable, and if you need low latency for video conferencing--go to where you can get it. This idea that no progress can take place until all boats float at the same level is a myth perpetrated by those stimulus-grabbing telcos whose entire business is, let's see, based on selling mass market services to their huge (monopoly, remember?) subscriber bases. The reality is this: just as in real estate, there is good location and bad location. The sooner we realize there is such a thing as good digital location, the sooner we can start building non-telco access/WAN networks that can deliver monster "HD dial-tone" (no, not 2 Mbps VTC but 10-100 Mbps VTC) which is, of course, what everyone (even the farmer) actually wants. But the telcos will not (and cannot) build that...

Respond to a comment.

Latest Government Technology News


Industry Solutions for Government

Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.

View All Industry Solutions