Government Technology

ITIL Revs Up at GTC


May 16, 2006 By

On Tuesday at GTC West, Hewlett-Packard presented an introductory workshop on ITIL titled: "Fundamentals of ITIL and IT Service Management."

IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) is a best-practice framework for service-focused IT processes originally developed in 1989 by the U.K. Office of Government Commerce.

As a framework of best practices, or documented common sense, it is a guide for "what to do" in managing information technology. Its key objectives are to align IT with the current and future needs of an agency and its customers, to improve the quality of IT service delivered and to reduce the long-term cost of service provision.

Intro workshop participants split into two groups, and both went through HP's IT Service Management (ITSM) simulation. ITSM is the service management section of ITIL. Key focus areas are quality of service delivery, cost of service provision, IT-to-business integration and flexibility and adaptability of IT.

The simulation involved Formula 1 motor racing. Workshop participants became the IT staff handling operations and support of several race cars.

One group was composed of engineers that were observing race car status on a large screen. When a problem arose, an engineer reported it to the service desk group, which then gathered all required information, wrote it down on a ticket and sent it to the IT support group.

For example a car was down because an engine monitoring system failed. The ticket said: "Farino, one car, Priority medium, question 14." The IT support group marked the Farino application as down, and looked up question 14, which might be something like: "What is 2/5 divided by 1/8?" One IT support group member was assigned to figure out the answer, and the answer was given to another person who would run it to the moderator. Either the question or the answer might be wrong (indicating incorrect data was supplied or the answer was erroneous) or all was correct. When correct, the system failure is repaired, and is taken off the game board.

The IT support group must troubleshoot the problems and fix them quickly. Every meter counted as the team was competing against other computer-simulated vehicles.

A board of directors observed, and a small group of IT analysts would comment on the team's performance after races. Two managers handled communications and worked to streamline the process.

In the beginning, tickets quickly piled up in IT support, stalling everything. The service desk didn't really know what information the IT support group needed. There were communication failures and confusion. Other groups started crowding around the IT support group. The cars didn't do very well and the team lost money. After the race the board of directors was not pleased, giving a rating of 2 out of 10. One director, however, was hopeful, noting that it was the first race and that things might improve. The IT analysts concurred with the board giving the team 2 out of 10.

After this first race the IT team was given time to organize itself. There were several pieces of data that the IT support group needed to do its job. It needed to know how many of the cars a problem was affecting, which applications were having problems, and a question number that would provide the problem needed to be solved. The service desk wasn't providing the support group the question number. Instead, the service desk was providing the support group a code that the support group would use to find the question number. As the bottleneck was in the support group, this code-to-question task was given to the support desk to do.

A knowledge base was drawn up on a board for the service desk as it was realized that several of problems would probably come up repeatedly. Instead of the support group personnel

You may use or reference this story with attribution and a link to
http://www.govtech.com/e-government/ITIL-Revs-Up-at-GTC.html


| More

Comments


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

Sponsored Links



Phone RSS

Government Best Practices

» A New Model for Human Resources
» Abandoning the High Cost of Enterprise Content Management