Government Technology
Emergency Management: news and solutions about emergency planning, response and disaster recovery

Arlington, Virginia Launches Regional Pilot for Outdoor Emergency Warning System

Mar 19, 2007, News Report

Found in: Regionalization / Consolidation

In this era of modern communications and emergency warning systems, is there a role for outdoor sirens?
On behalf of the National Capital Region, Arlington County will try to answer that question, managing a pilot test beginning this month of new outdoor warning system technology -- sometimes referred to as "sirens" -- to see if the technology can add to the emergency communications "system of systems."

This is not your father's air raid siren.

The new outdoor system combines a horn blast with a loudspeaker, which will broadcast a clear message, giving specific instructions. The system can be tested silently, without disturbing residents. Emergencies such as the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita highlighted the need for a wider public warning system to reach people who might not receive emergency warnings from other sources.
The system, if found to be effective, would supplement the region's many other emergency notification systems.
The region's emergency managers want to see how effectively the outdoor warning system reaches people who do not have mobile devices, who are visiting the National Capital Region, or who are outside or away from television, radio, and telephones. In addition, the warning system can be activated in specific neighborhoods only, enabling police to help look for a lost child, for example.

The federally funded $400,000 pilot program is authorized by the Emergency Preparedness Council of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The pilot will test effectiveness in an urban environment (high rise buildings, etc) as well as park settings and will test the ability to expand the system to a city-wide scale.

Arlington County's Office of Emergency Management, (OEM), in partnership with the city of Alexandria's Office of Emergency Management, was selected under a federal grant from the Department of Homeland Security for the project. They will test its effectiveness in open space and in areas of dense, high-rise buildings, as well as how well it reaches daytime and nighttime populations and its scalability.

The pilot test system is being installed this month. Initial testing will test the reception of the system and will be silent. Testing involving sound and voice will take place at a later time (to be announced).

System components that are being installed:
  • Horns will be mounted near the tops of utility poles.
  • Conduits and battery supplies will be mounted to supply power to those poles. A receiving antenna will be mounted on the top of the pole (roughly 20 inches tall).
  • "Base units" (roughly 2' x 2' x 2') will be installed in Arlington's OEM office and in Alexandria's OEM office. These are the primary control stations.
  • Relay-antennas will be mounted on tall-building rooftops. The radio frequencies used to activate the "horns" require these antennas to provide coverage to all sites. The antennas are roughly 40" and may be mounted on supports up to 5 feet above the roof. Generally, they will be invisible from the street.

Arlington's emergency managers use a "system of systems" to provide urgent information to those who live in, work in, and visit Arlington.

Arlington's current emergency communications systems include Arlington Alert, which sends text messages to mobile devices and email. Arlington also sends information to commercial broadcast media, keeps its web site current, and puts emergency information on 1700AM Arlington, a low-wattage radio station with emergency information. Arlington also uses Reverse 911 for highly localized needs.

On September 15, 2005, the Emergency Preparedness Council of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments received a copy and presentation of Public Safety Best Practices: Talking Siren Technology. The report highlights the potential value of outdoor voice warning systems as part of an integrated public alerting "system of systems." The best practices identified by the study included integrated public outdoor warning systems with indoor warning such as NOAA.

The outdoor warning system concept was supported and promoted by the Arlington County Citizen Corps Council in 2004. This group of volunteers spent hundreds of hours to insure the region received funding for the outdoor warning pilot.

Arlington and Alexandria are the first jurisdictions in the region to install this type of alerting system that addresses public outreach and alerting needs for people attending special events, visiting or in transit. Outdoor warning systems are installed in other parts of the country, including San Francisco and nuclear power plants.

The outdoor warning system is manufactured by MadahCom Inc.

Comments

By Anonymous on Mar 23, 2007

This is what the public needs. Communications during emergencies is exactly what we need. I hope the project goes well and others take the initiative to follow through with similar systems. This is not only a great use of tax money but also using our technology to protect us and minimize losses during an attack or emergency whether man-made or natural.

By Anonymous on Mar 22, 2007

The comments against MadahCom are simply unfounded and false. Sounds like someone is bitter about not getting the project. The truth is that this company has a great working relationship with the armed services, has great tactical systems that has saved many lives in Iraq protecting out troops from mortar attacks. If they are no good, why would Northrop Grumman use them solely on their detect, warn, and destroy systems? I'm sure several companies put together proposals to try to win this pilot project and that happened to be the company that seemed to have their stuff together. So, instead of criticizing the ones making it happen, let's look forward and have the best warning systems possible, it can only benefit you, me, and our children.

By Anonymous on Mar 22, 2007

While the CEO of the company is Israeli, the company and its manufacturing in based in Sarasota Florida. Thanks for playing though.

By Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007

The sirens they are putting in are the cheapest and least effective on the market. If this is the prototype then someone needs to investigate. The Marine Corps uses this product and has to add another companies sirens just to make it work. The company is an Israeli company and for some reason they are getting preference over American made products. Makes you wonder about how your tax dollars are being spent. All this work and they are buying the cheapest made product on the market. They will have a lot of problems with this system not being heard. What a waste of time. Wonder who's getting some bucks on the side of this project from the Israeli's?

Respond to a comment.

If You Liked This Article, You May Also Like...

Related Products and Services

Latest News in Regionalization / Consolidation


Latest Government Technology News


Industry Solutions for Government

Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.

View All Industry Solutions

Marketplace



This section
brought to you by:


Dispatch Operations and
Interoperability Survey

Geographic terrain, an overloaded infrastructure and outdated technologies put into question a jurisdiction's level of optimal interoperability in an emergency situation. Emergency Management would like to understand the problem as it relates to dispatch centers ability to communicate with first responders effectively. Click Here to take the survey

Dispatch Operations and Interoperability

Case Study - Morris County, New Jersey The Morris County Communications Center upgraded to a new trunked radio system with the benefits of a cellular network, extending coverage beyond county lines


Case Study - Iredell County, North Carolina Spanning over 570 sq miles, it became imperative that the Iredell County Emergency Communications, Operations and Management extend it's communications systems to enhance reliability, security, and coverage.


Case Study - City of Anaheim, California The City of Anaheim saw an opportunity to leverage existing GST and partner with nearby cities to enhance safety operations through data interoperability.


Case Study - Charlottesville, Virginia Fire Department Taking advantage of a range of interoperability solution, the Charlottesville Fire Department has achieved a network that can serve as backup to their existing public safety network.


Sprint ERT Go-Kit with GST Optima Rapid, interoperable communications for emergencies, drills and field exercises.


Optimal Interoperability Until recently it was not possible to cost effectively connect commercial networks to LMR systems. Improvements in communications technology have resulted in greatly enhanced operational capability and have reduced the log-term cost of communications system ownership.


Video


DHS Grant Links

DHS Grants and Assistance Programs Link to overview of available grants administered by The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)


Fact Sheet: Fiscal Year 2008 Preparedness Grants Major changes in funding and focus for 2008 DHS grant programs


Remarks on 2008 Homeland Security Grant Guidance DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff and FEMA Administrator David Paulison


DHS FY 2008 Infrastructure Protection Activities An overview, released May 16, 2008.


2008 Infrastructure Protection Activities Funding Awarded by the DHS


Funding Resources for Your Community's Communications Project