Government Technology
Government Technology: State & Local Government News Articles

Using the Internet to Physically Harm



Print
Comment
Strange Lights

Apr 16, 2008, By Gina M. Scott

Near the end of March an historic first took place: people were deliberately physically harmed through the Internet. In what sounds like an episode of the Outer Limits, unknown people maliciously posted JavaScript images and animations designed to trigger seizures in people with photosensitive epilepsy to the message boards of the Epilepsy Foundation's Web site.

This is not a first to be proud of.

This was not your typical Web site hack. People were the target, not the information contained on the site. The bright colored, flashing animations caused people to freeze, get migraines or have full-on seizures. But hack is a misnomer. The people who carried out this attack can not be called hackers because there was little if any computer skill involved. Practically anyone can go to a message board and upload an image. Coordination, perhaps. Skill, not really.

For the most part people condemned the act as heinous -- nothing more than a cheap shot. Yet some people found it funny. Many people left the comment LULZ -- a slang term meaning "laugher at another's expense," or "just for the hell of it." Those who find humor in cruelty would probably go around tripping elderly people for a laugh -- but what if it was their grandmother?

One person suggested that people with epilepsy should just not use computers. What a great idea. Perhaps they could go back to strictly snail mail and phones. They don't need jobs --who uses computers at work? Shutting people away from society is not an option.

The Internet is no longer just an encyclopedia replacement. Web 2.0 advancements have allowed us all to connect and share our lives online. The Epilepsy Foundation's forums are a perfect example of such connections. These forums, and the like, give people anonymity and the freedom to ask the questions they might be otherwise scared to ask since epilepsy still carries with it the stigma of thousands of years of misunderstanding. The forums give millions of people a chance to discuss questions about the disorder, medication options, different ways of controlling seizures and how to explain Epilepsy to friends and family. Not to mention the emotional support one gains by talking to people in similar situations.

So why attack it?

If someone attacked a political site because they disagreed with the position that would be one thing (it would still be wrong, but at least there would be a reason). What was the purpose of attacking a non-profit site and those seeking help? Does some group have something against people with epilepsy? Most likely not. This is not the dark ages. People with epilepsy are no longer believed to be demon possessed. But they were a vulnerable target. Like the many snickering LULZ comments, this was probably just some stupid prank meant to cause a media stir. Maybe they did it for kicks, to see if they could.

Hopefully all the attention from this attack will create better understanding of epilepsy. But it looks likes times have changed and we must not only worry about online scammers stealing identities, or emptying bank accounts -- we have to worry about assault.

KW

Comments

By Camden Crestwood Camden on May 1, 2008

Visiting the Epilepsy Foundation's Web site, it appears you have to create a personal profile to be able to contribute content. Were they unable to identify or track those responsible?

By Palm owner/voter mother/bus Epileptic FL Beach Palm on Apr 28, 2008

Why don't we go for attempted murder? Easily could have happened. Since this would most likely be a criminal matter, no Class Action Status...but I ask you, if someone had done something even half as offensive on another (pick a "sexy" non-for-profit) site, it would be on the cover of the NY Times.

By Anonymous on Apr 23, 2008

I wonder if the act of posting with intent to cause harm reaches the level of an assualt or disorderly conduct. It would seem to reach the level in which someone could be sued.

By Ferris Ferris on Apr 22, 2008

I think it is horrible that people think it is funny to cause harm to others. Epilepsy is serious and many do not understand that posting a message can harm others. I think before people make fun of a situation they should put themselves in others shoes. Very good article.

By Renae Renae on Apr 18, 2008

Epilepsy made the news. I just wish the media would be a bit more helpful on reporting the trouble people are having on the new FDA approved Dilantin and what it has been doing to our bodies.

Respond to a comment.

If You Liked This Article, You May Also Like...


Latest Government Technology News


Industry Solutions for Government

Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.

View All Industry Solutions

Related Products and Services

Marketplace



This section
brought to you by:


Mobile Communications Survey Executive Summary

More than 200 responses were captured to help gauge the effectiveness and types of communications and situational awareness capabilities currently deployed for emergency response. View the Executive Summary Now!

Dispatch Operations and Interoperability

A New Era in Public Safety BlackBerry® smartphones running on Sprint networks deliver a wide range of applications that are transforming public safety operations.


Hurricane Preparedness Tips When a hurricane hits, are you prepared to keep in touch?


Case Study - Morris County, New Jersey The Morris County Communications Center upgraded to a new trunked radio system with the benefits of a cellular network, extending coverage beyond county lines


Case Study - Iredell County, North Carolina Spanning over 570 sq miles, it became imperative that the Iredell County Emergency Communications, Operations and Management extend it's communications systems to enhance reliability, security, and coverage.


Case Study - City of Anaheim, California The City of Anaheim saw an opportunity to leverage existing GST and partner with nearby cities to enhance safety operations through data interoperability.


Case Study - Charlottesville, Virginia Fire Department Taking advantage of a range of interoperability solution, the Charlottesville Fire Department has achieved a network that can serve as backup to their existing public safety network.


Sprint ERT Go-Kit with GST Optima Rapid, interoperable communications for emergencies, drills and field exercises.


Optimal Interoperability Until recently it was not possible to cost effectively connect commercial networks to LMR systems. Improvements in communications technology have resulted in greatly enhanced operational capability and have reduced the log-term cost of communications system ownership.


Multi-agency interoperability for Public Safety Establishing cross-agency, real-time situational awareness is critical to effective incident management as well as daily resource management.


Video


DHS Grant Links

DHS Grants and Assistance Programs Link to overview of available grants administered by The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)


Fact Sheet: Fiscal Year 2008 Preparedness Grants Major changes in funding and focus for 2008 DHS grant programs


Remarks on 2008 Homeland Security Grant Guidance DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff and FEMA Administrator David Paulison


$1.8 billion in DHS Homeland Security Grant Program Awards


Funding Public Safety Communications Whether you are a law enforcement agency, looking for funding to support an interoperable communications solution or a school, seeking to improve communications between building administrators, grants may provide the funding you need to implement a robust, scalable communication system.


Yes! I would like more information about Sprint's dispatch operations and interoperability solutions.