Jun 30, 2008, By Sascha D. Meinrath
How we measure success is as important as what we are measuring. On March 19, 2008, the FCC dramatically revised its broadband data collection, in essence, finally giving in to mounting evidence that current assessments have been woefully inadequate. Previous data collection may have allowed politicians to declare "mission accomplished" - that universal affordable broadband is available throughout the United States - yet the fact remains that large swaths of the United States have fallen behind a growing list of other countries in broadband provision.
Within the U.S. context, wireless networks have often followed a familiar trajectory: utilizing hyperbolic and misleading rhetoric in making promises to local communities; obfuscating the state of actual deployment and the real-world service levels provided; and ignoring success stories that point to innovative business models overseas that are unheard-of in the United States. Sylvia Cadena, coordinator of WiLAC in Ecuador, points out one of the most overlooked areas of innovation in this realm, "[Rather] than municipal networks, we look more for community networks, which although [they] are affected by the same context, do not depend on the political will, but the organization and hard work of its members."
In fact, these community networking organizations have been the groups that pioneered large-scale wireless networking technologies - eight years ago, when there were few companies deploying wireless networks, dedicated groups of technology experts, programmers and community organizers were developing and deploying wireless technologies in London, San Francisco and Urbana, Ill. Today, the networking technologies of these groups have matured to the point where relatively astounding community networks have been deployed using the wireless systems developed by this global network of open source programmers.
Growing Up
Dana Spiegel, president and executive director of NYCwireless, has followed the maturation of these technologies and their real-world deployments throughout North America. "The interesting and inspirational networks are the ones that grew out of community wireless initiative," she said. "In particular, Austin, Texas, and Montreal are great examples." Both cities formed public-private partnerships, but the foundation has been locally based nongovernmental organizations, not private, for-profit companies, Spiegel said, "These cities were smart enough to recognize that their best chance of success was not only to build upon the work of local volunteers, but to involve them intimately in the creation of the local nets. This creates an incentive for other local activists and volunteers, and ensures there's a direct connection to the people who are going to be the early adopters of these nets."
Anthony Townsend, a community wireless movement veteran and research director at the Institute for the Future, also looks "mostly outside the U.S." for innovative projects. "The work of Ile Sans Fil in Montreal is probably the most interesting because it's a great example of a community network that has effectively graduated to become the municipal network. Something similar is going on in Austin, Texas, as well," said Townsend. In both cases, innovative business models have been developed to use local expertise and empower community organizations to deploy and manage the networks.
Richard MacKinnon, president of Austin Wireless, also investigates overseas community wireless deployments and said he's "inspired by the work of Ramon Roca and Guifi.net in Catalan." Guifi.net is a grass-roots initiative formed to overcome the shortcomings of telecom incumbents who failed to adequately serve local communities. "This community wireless network was created to provide connectivity for scores of rural villages that were underserved by Telefonica," he said. "‘Underserved' is code for when an incumbent service provider declines to provide service or provides it at monopoly prices," MacKinnon continued. "Guifi.net developed a business and technological model and taught people how to take control of their economic destiny away from Telefonica."
Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.
View All Industry SolutionsThis section
brought to you by:
Emergency Management magazine invites you to participate in our Communications and Interoperable Technology Survey. Our 11 questions are very brief and should only take 5 minutes of your time.
Complete our survey now, and enter to win a $25 Amazon Gift Card!
Webinar: A New Era in Public Safety Wednesday, December 10, 2008 from 11:00 am - 12:00 pm PST/2:00 pm - 3:00 pm EST
A New Era in Public Safety BlackBerry® smartphones running on Sprint networks deliver a wide range of applications that are transforming public safety operations.
Hurricane Preparedness Tips When a hurricane hits, are you prepared to keep in touch?
Case Study - Morris County, New Jersey The Morris County Communications Center upgraded to a new trunked radio system with the benefits of a cellular network, extending coverage beyond county lines
Case Study - Iredell County, North Carolina Spanning over 570 sq miles, it became imperative that the Iredell County Emergency Communications, Operations and Management extend it's communications systems to enhance reliability, security, and coverage.
Case Study - City of Anaheim, California The City of Anaheim saw an opportunity to leverage existing GST and partner with nearby cities to enhance safety operations through data interoperability.
Case Study - Charlottesville, Virginia Fire Department Taking advantage of a range of interoperability solution, the Charlottesville Fire Department has achieved a network that can serve as backup to their existing public safety network.
Sprint ERT Go-Kit with GST Optima Rapid, interoperable communications for emergencies, drills and field exercises.
Optimal Interoperability Until recently it was not possible to cost effectively connect commercial networks to LMR systems. Improvements in communications technology have resulted in greatly enhanced operational capability and have reduced the log-term cost of communications system ownership.
Multi-agency interoperability for Public Safety Establishing cross-agency, real-time situational awareness is critical to effective incident management as well as daily resource management.
DHS Grants and Assistance Programs Link to overview of available grants administered by The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Fact Sheet: Fiscal Year 2008 Preparedness Grants Major changes in funding and focus for 2008 DHS grant programs
Remarks on 2008 Homeland Security Grant Guidance DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff and FEMA Administrator David Paulison
$1.8 billion in DHS Homeland Security Grant Program Awards
Funding Public Safety Communications Whether you are a law enforcement agency, looking for funding to support an interoperable communications solution or a school, seeking to improve communications between building administrators, grants may provide the funding you need to implement a robust, scalable communication system.