Jul 31, 2008, By Andy Opsahl, Features Editor
Indiana's automated welfare eligibility pilot may halt operations after rolling out services in 59 of the state's 92 counties. A group of vendors led by IBM ran the project under a $1.16 billion, 10-year contract. The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture recommended the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration (FSSA) delay any further rollout of the system on the grounds that it kept welfare recipients waiting too long for benefits.
"Indiana's most recent monthly reports indicate a decline in the timeliness of application processing that has occurred in the pilot region since the transition to the modernized service delivery model. Indiana's statewide application processing rate also continues to be a concern," said a letter from FNS Regional Administrator Ollice Holden to FSSA Secretary Mitch Roob.
No Indiana FSSA representatives were immediately available to comment on this story.
Indiana's initiative is the latest welfare system outsourcing project to run into serious problems. Texas cancelled a similar contract last year with Accenture which would have privatized the state's welfare eligibility process.
The Indiana project, which kicked off in October, aimed to accelerate eligibility by eliminating individually assigned caseworkers and empowering anyone answering the phone to help customers, said Zach Main, director of the FSSA's Division of Family Resources in an April interview with Government Technology.
At the time, Main criticized Texas' use of inexperienced call-center workers.
"Texas modernized and thought they could replace seasoned caseworkers with $8-per-hour people off the street," Main said. "We had an incredibly educated work force -- a lot of them with master's degrees and bachelor's degrees. The average tenure was more than 10 years, especially as you got into more rural areas. ... We said, 'These people are too valuable to let them go off to other places.'"
The FSSA turned 1,500 of its 2,200-person work force into IBM employees. The agency required IBM to offer all 1,500 employees jobs for a minimum of two years at the same pay and benefits they received from the state.
In his April interview, Main said citizens were satisfied with call-center operations, even though callers were waiting longer than planned to speak to eligibility workers. The FSSA planned for phone hold times of only 90 seconds. Instead, callers waited an average of five minutes, Main said.
He added that many callers were understanding when call-center operators apologized for those delays. "[Clients] say, 'Are you kidding me? Five minutes on the phone? I waited 10 minutes at the bus stop just to catch the first of two buses I needed to take to the county welfare office. This is incredibly convenient for us.'"
Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.
View All Industry SolutionsThis section
brought to you by:
More than 200 responses were captured to help gauge the effectiveness and types of communications and situational awareness capabilities currently deployed for emergency response. View the Executive Summary Now!
A New Era in Public Safety BlackBerry® smartphones running on Sprint networks deliver a wide range of applications that are transforming public safety operations.
Hurricane Preparedness Tips When a hurricane hits, are you prepared to keep in touch?
Case Study - Morris County, New Jersey The Morris County Communications Center upgraded to a new trunked radio system with the benefits of a cellular network, extending coverage beyond county lines
Case Study - Iredell County, North Carolina Spanning over 570 sq miles, it became imperative that the Iredell County Emergency Communications, Operations and Management extend it's communications systems to enhance reliability, security, and coverage.
Case Study - City of Anaheim, California The City of Anaheim saw an opportunity to leverage existing GST and partner with nearby cities to enhance safety operations through data interoperability.
Case Study - Charlottesville, Virginia Fire Department Taking advantage of a range of interoperability solution, the Charlottesville Fire Department has achieved a network that can serve as backup to their existing public safety network.
Sprint ERT Go-Kit with GST Optima Rapid, interoperable communications for emergencies, drills and field exercises.
Optimal Interoperability Until recently it was not possible to cost effectively connect commercial networks to LMR systems. Improvements in communications technology have resulted in greatly enhanced operational capability and have reduced the log-term cost of communications system ownership.
Multi-agency interoperability for Public Safety Establishing cross-agency, real-time situational awareness is critical to effective incident management as well as daily resource management.
DHS Grants and Assistance Programs Link to overview of available grants administered by The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Fact Sheet: Fiscal Year 2008 Preparedness Grants Major changes in funding and focus for 2008 DHS grant programs
Remarks on 2008 Homeland Security Grant Guidance DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff and FEMA Administrator David Paulison
$1.8 billion in DHS Homeland Security Grant Program Awards
Funding Public Safety Communications Whether you are a law enforcement agency, looking for funding to support an interoperable communications solution or a school, seeking to improve communications between building administrators, grants may provide the funding you need to implement a robust, scalable communication system.
The Food and Nutrition Service subsequently explained their position and acknowledged that FNS did not have statutory power to halt this project. See the Indiana Governor's site The following is an excerpt from an email received today from Kate Houston, deputy undersecretary of agriculture for food and nutrition and consumer services: "Our June 23 letter states that "FNS expects FSSA to realize substantial improvements in the area of application processing before the State proceeds with any additional roll-out of the modernization project. This was not an order to stop rolling out - rather a statement that we trusted Indiana's commitment to successful implementation would lead the State to this same conclusion. "FNS does not have the authority to order the State to stop the project. As your statement notes, FNS has authority to suspend/disallow administrative costs under 7CFR276.4. This authority is directed at violations of the Act and regulations. We did not invoke this authority in our June 23 communication." Link to this event: http://www.in.gov/portal/news_events/24779.htm I think it important for your publication to completely inform its clients.