Apr 29, 2008, News Report
Found in: Public Safety / Justice / Homeland Security
Alabama has become one of only 16 states to achieve the nation's highest accreditation standard when it comes to emergency preparedness and response. To achieve accreditation, Alabama documented compliance with 58 standards and underwent a peer review assessment by Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP) examiners.
"This achievement is a clear demonstration of the high priority we place on protecting Alabama citizens," said Governor Bob Riley. "During the past few years, we've built a first-rate, comprehensive system for handling emergencies and disasters. I commend our Alabama Emergency Management Agency and emergency preparedness teams all across the state for this major milestone."
"I'm so proud of what my staff has accomplished and it has taken a lot of work to achieve EMAP accreditation," said Alabama Emergency Management Director Brock Long. "I also want the residents of Alabama to know how serious AEMA views the goal of making sure the residents of Alabama are safe."
EMAP is a voluntary accreditation process for state and local government programs that coordinate preparedness and response activities for disasters, from tornadoes to terrorist acts. It recognizes the ability of a state or local government to bring together personnel, resources and communications from a variety of agencies in preparation for and in response to an emergency. EMAP is the only accreditation process for state and local emergency management preparedness.
Accreditation is a means of demonstrating, through program assessment, documentation and on-site assessment by an independent team, that a program meets national standards. Accreditation is valid for five years from the date the EMAP Commission grants accreditation. Accredited programs must maintain compliance with EMAP standards and be reassessed in five years to maintain accredited status.
Working collaboratively since 1997, state, local and federal emergency managers developed EMAP to provide quality standards and a process for determining compliance. "States like Alabama that work toward and achieve compliance with these standards are at the forefront in ensuring their residents are served by a comprehensive system to deal with disasters," Tim Manning, chairperson of the EMAP Commission and director of New Mexico Emergency Management, said in a statement.
Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.
View All Industry SolutionsThis section
brought to you by:
Geographic terrain, an overloaded infrastructure and outdated technologies put into question a jurisdiction's level of optimal interoperability in an emergency situation. Emergency Management would like to understand the problem as it relates to dispatch centers ability to communicate with first responders effectively. Click Here to take the survey
Case Study - Morris County, New Jersey The Morris County Communications Center upgraded to a new trunked radio system with the benefits of a cellular network, extending coverage beyond county lines
Case Study - Iredell County, North Carolina Spanning over 570 sq miles, it became imperative that the Iredell County Emergency Communications, Operations and Management extend it's communications systems to enhance reliability, security, and coverage.
Case Study - City of Anaheim, California The City of Anaheim saw an opportunity to leverage existing GST and partner with nearby cities to enhance safety operations through data interoperability.
Case Study - Charlottesville, Virginia Fire Department Taking advantage of a range of interoperability solution, the Charlottesville Fire Department has achieved a network that can serve as backup to their existing public safety network.
Sprint ERT Go-Kit with GST Optima Rapid, interoperable communications for emergencies, drills and field exercises.
Optimal Interoperability Until recently it was not possible to cost effectively connect commercial networks to LMR systems. Improvements in communications technology have resulted in greatly enhanced operational capability and have reduced the log-term cost of communications system ownership.
DHS Grants and Assistance Programs Link to overview of available grants administered by The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Fact Sheet: Fiscal Year 2008 Preparedness Grants Major changes in funding and focus for 2008 DHS grant programs
Remarks on 2008 Homeland Security Grant Guidance DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff and FEMA Administrator David Paulison
DHS FY 2008 Infrastructure Protection Activities An overview, released May 16, 2008.
2008 Infrastructure Protection Activities Funding Awarded by the DHS
Funding Resources for Your Community's Communications Project