May 19, 2008, News Report
Found in: Security
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced today that 38 people with ties to international organized crime have been charged in two separate indictments involving computer and credit card fraud schemes. Thirty-three people were charged by a grand jury for their participation in an international racketeering scheme. This scheme used the Internet to defraud thousands of victims and hundreds of financial institutions. Seven people were charged in a District of Connecticut indictment for their roles in an Internet phishing scheme, including two who were also charged in the Los Angeles case.
U.S. law enforcement authorities are executing nine arrest warrants in the Los Angeles area and Romanian law enforcement authorities are executing search warrants in Romania today in connection with the racketeering indictment.
"International organized crime poses a serious threat not only to the United States and Romania, but to all nations," said Deputy Attorney General Mark R. Filip. "Criminals who exploit the power and convenience of the Internet do not recognize national borders; therefore our efforts to prevent their attacks cannot end at our borders either. Through cooperation with our international partners, we can disrupt and dismantle these enterprises, just as we have done today with these indictments and arrests."
The Los Angeles indictment alleges a conspiracy to violate the RICO Act; conspiracy in connection with access devices; production, use and trafficking in counterfeit access devices; bank fraud; aggravated identity theft; unauthorized access to a protected computer; possession of device making equipment; and a forfeiture allegation.
According to the indictment, the Romania-based members of the enterprise obtained thousands of credit and debit card accounts and related personal information by phishing, with more than 1.3 million spam e-mails sent in one phishing attack. Once directed to a bogus site, victims were then prompted at those sites to enter access and personal information.
The Romanian "suppliers" collected the victims' information and sent the data to U.S.-based "cashiers" via Internet "chat" messages. The domestic cashiers used hardware called encoders to record the fraudulently obtained information onto the magnetic strips on the back of credit and debit cards, and similar cards such as hotel keys.
Cashiers then directed "runners" to test the fraudulent cards by checking balances or withdrawing small amounts of money at ATMs. The cards that were successfully tested, known as "cashable" cards, were used to withdraw money from ATMs or point of sale terminals that the cashiers had determined permitted the highest withdrawal limits. A portion of the proceeds was then wire transferred to the supplier who had provided the access device information.
"Partnerships and cooperation among all levels of law enforcement -- both domestic and foreign -- are the keys to tackling criminal activity that increasingly knows no borders," said U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Thomas P. O'Brien. "Just as street gangs don't respect municipal borders, computer criminals can reach into other countries and prey upon unsuspecting victims who have no idea their identities and money are going to another country."
The District of Connecticut investigation resulted from a citizen's complaint concerning a fraudulent e-mail message made to appear as if it originated from Connecticut-based People's Bank. The e-mail message directed victims to a computer in Minnesota that had been compromised, or "hacked," and used to host a counterfeit People's Bank Internet site. During the course of the investigation, it was determined that the individuals had engaged in similar phishing schemes against many other financial institutions and companies, including Citibank, Capital One, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Comerica Bank, Wells Fargo & Co., eBay and PayPal.
"This case shows that Internet fraudsters cannot avoid prosecution just by launching their attacks against U.S. residents and U.S. companies from overseas," said Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut Nora R. Dannehy. "With the help of our law enforcement partners around the world, we will investigate and prosecute fraudsters wherever they can be found."
Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.
View All Industry SolutionsThis section
brought to you by:
Geographic terrain, an overloaded infrastructure and outdated technologies put into question a jurisdiction's level of optimal interoperability in an emergency situation. Emergency Management would like to understand the problem as it relates to dispatch centers ability to communicate with first responders effectively. Click Here to take the survey
Case Study - Morris County, New Jersey The Morris County Communications Center upgraded to a new trunked radio system with the benefits of a cellular network, extending coverage beyond county lines
Case Study - Iredell County, North Carolina Spanning over 570 sq miles, it became imperative that the Iredell County Emergency Communications, Operations and Management extend it's communications systems to enhance reliability, security, and coverage.
Case Study - City of Anaheim, California The City of Anaheim saw an opportunity to leverage existing GST and partner with nearby cities to enhance safety operations through data interoperability.
Case Study - Charlottesville, Virginia Fire Department Taking advantage of a range of interoperability solution, the Charlottesville Fire Department has achieved a network that can serve as backup to their existing public safety network.
Sprint ERT Go-Kit with GST Optima Rapid, interoperable communications for emergencies, drills and field exercises.
Optimal Interoperability Until recently it was not possible to cost effectively connect commercial networks to LMR systems. Improvements in communications technology have resulted in greatly enhanced operational capability and have reduced the log-term cost of communications system ownership.
DHS Grants and Assistance Programs Link to overview of available grants administered by The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Fact Sheet: Fiscal Year 2008 Preparedness Grants Major changes in funding and focus for 2008 DHS grant programs
Remarks on 2008 Homeland Security Grant Guidance DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff and FEMA Administrator David Paulison
DHS FY 2008 Infrastructure Protection Activities An overview, released May 16, 2008.
2008 Infrastructure Protection Activities Funding Awarded by the DHS
Funding Resources for Your Community's Communications Project