Government Technology
Government Technology: State & Local Government News Articles

Georgia Aims to Save State Money With IBM Outsourcing Deal

Bookmark and Share
Comment

Georgia CIO Patrick Moore, Governor Sonny Perdue and COO Jim Lientz/Photo by Kelly LaDuke

Apr 15, 2009, By David Raths

"Georgia's technology investments have not resulted in a reliable, recoverable and secure system that ensures data is protected and needs are being met." -- Gov. Sonny Perdue, November 2008.


In announcing that the state had signed contracts with IBM and AT and T to outsource much of its IT infrastructure, Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue called the bold step necessary because he could no longer assure Georgians about the security of their data.

"Imagine a CEO saying that to his customers," said Patrick Moore, CIO of Georgia. "A governor shouldn't have to say that to his citizens."

As executive director of the Georgia Technology Authority (GTA), Moore saw himself as someone leading an agency that was failing its constituencies in many ways. Shortcomings he identified included unnecessary duplication of efforts, inefficient allocation of resources, and an inability to promote and adopt best practices.

After several years of studying the issue, in 2008 Georgia decided to become the second state to outsource most of its IT infrastructure. (In 2005 Virginia entered into a 10-year, $2 billion partnership with Northrop Grumman for the provision of most of its IT infrastructure services. Texas has outsourced its data center provisioning.)

"Many states are reaching the same conclusion to consolidate infrastructure," Moore explained in a recent interview with Public CIO. "Then the question becomes: Do you outsource or insource those services?" That's up to each state to decide, he said. Texas and Virginia have been pioneers in outsourcing, and Michigan has been for insourcing. "We looked at all their experiences in our decision calculus."

The infrastructure services deal with IBM, which took effect April 1, is valued at $873 million over eight years with two, one-year options to renew. It includes mainframes, servers, printers, service desk, end-user computing and disaster recovery. Dell and Xerox are subcontractors. The telecommunications pact with AT and T starts May 1, 2009, and includes wide-area network, local-area network and voice services. It's valued at $346 million over five years with two, one-year options to renew. The state said it expects to save an estimated $180 million compared to existing IT spending across the 12 agencies affected by the change.

 

The Bigger Picture

Georgia's decision to outsource IT infrastructure is part of a larger effort by the Perdue administration to focus on bringing private-sector practices to state government services. Describing himself as the "CEO of the ninth largest, third fastest-growing state," Perdue, the state's first Republican governor since the 1870s, has stressed the principles of efficiency, transparency, accountability and customer service.

Among his first steps after becoming governor in 2003 was the establishment of the Commission for a New Georgia (CNG), a group of business executives that creates task forces to examine state practices and makes efficiency recommendations. The state is carrying through many of the commission's streamlining recommendations on procurement and management of real-estate assets. Early in its deliberations, the CNG identified the GTA as an outsourcing target.

Perdue also created a state chief operating officer position and named Jim Lientz, a former Bank of America executive, to the post in 2003.

Lientz said he has spent the past six years applying business principles to state government activities. "When we came in, the state didn't know what real estate and leases it had or how many vehicles it owned," he said. "These are things that are basic for the private sector."

Photo: Georgia COO Jim Lientz

A 2008 CNG report noted that today, detailed records on


Comments

By Anonymous on Sep 14, 2009

Update: Invoices from IBM and AT&T are running at $16M per month. GTA is collecting fees from the agencies of $13.8M per month. To quote Patrick Moore, "this is keeping us up at night."

By Anonymous on May 6, 2009

"Commission for a New Georgia (CNG), a group of business executives that creates task forces to examine state practices and makes efficiency recommendations. The state is carrying through many of the commission's streamlining recommendations on procurement and management of real-estate assets. Early in its deliberations, the CNG identified the GTA as an outsourcing target." Talk about a stacked deck! Truth is, that has tried to get their hands on this "cash cow" during the previous administration. This is political paybacks and a tax payer money grab. Just what business will they run it like? Enron, MCI? BofA?

By Anonymous on May 6, 2009

This is really Georgia's way of saying that they would rather switch than fight. The government allowed all of the state agencies to create their own IT departments and they setup GTA to fail by not giving them any real power or authority. Outsourcing is old news that has already been proven to be the wrong way to go. GA will pay dearly for this decision. Ask the city of San Diego.

By Anonymous on Apr 29, 2009

What so many seem to overlook is that now ALL of Georgia's Secure data is now being handled by non-governmental companies, not even within the state of Georgia! It's now being split between AT&T and IBM.... Not sure who's blonde moment it was to move GEORGIA's IT center to NORTH CAROLINA! But I have a huge problem with that! For those who pay attention closely to things such as this, maybe instead of this structure of 'higer-ups' (who by the way are the EXACT same ones who ran GTA into the ground to begin with), maybe instead of weeding out the "workers", you should seriously think about the 100+ management left, all of which are making at least 6 figures a year! For those who haven't kept up to date with this, I'm personally sitting back and just waiting with anticipation to see how long this lasts before it all crumbles down around their ankles... not to mention how interesting it'll be when we get a Governor who has some IT knowledge get in here and get this stuff straight... but properly!!!

By Anonymous on Apr 27, 2009

There is plenty of blame to go around. State agency data centers are notoriously self-serving, slow to adapt best practices, isolationist and reactionary. Had they 'seen the writing on the wall' and pulled together to address these issues themselves they could have saved a lot of money, saved a lot of state employee jobs and been the heroes of the transformation.

By Anonymous on Apr 23, 2009

Once again the big corporate Republicans are convinced outsourcing is the way to go. These people could care less about state employees and their families. Lets hear about those who lost their jobs, after years of service, and the sad situation they now face. You won't hear it here. The fat cat/wall street boys are now running GA. If you are a state employee, good luck.

Respond to a comment.

Latest Government Technology News


Industry Solutions for Government

Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.

View All Industry Solutions

Related Products and Services

Marketplace


Video

More Video >