Nov 14, 2006, By Gina M. Scott
The UK identity cards will hold 50 categories of biometric information which will be stored in the registry. When asked how the Identity and Passport Service (ISP) was planning to keep the information secure, Hall explained that the registry will "be security accredited to the highest standard," and "around this database we will have very tight controls to ensure that those able to access information have been security vetted." Hall approximated that 3,000 people would have access to the database at the ISP; this does not, however, include the various government, police and emergency personnel who would also have access.Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.
View All Industry Solutions
Vendors charging high maintenance fees are put on notice to cut their rates by Steve Emanuel, CIO of Montgomery County, Md.
Spanning earthquakes to water meters, Beverly Hills rolled out an interactive and interoperable Web-based GIS portal for emergency operations and public information.
Virtual Beverly Hills was recently challenged when a crowd of more than 20,000 ran through town.
Browse hundreds of public sector career opportunities in GovTech's new jobs section. Popular job searches: government IT, public safety, GIS, transportation, CIO, security, health
Comments
I can appreciate the concern citizens feel when required to supply personal information. There is always the fear of what will occur with disclosure; afterall, knowledge is power. My question to the opposition of the National Identity Scheme and Registry would be, do you worry more about the possible threat of privacy or about the welfare of the ones you love? In my opinion, I would rather offer up every dark secret I have ever closeted than risk the threat of terroristic violence. Information is power and I would prefer to believe my security will be best served by supporting those government officals by cooperating in an effort of civic duty to ensure that the real threats are revealed. To me, risking a database threat is minimal compared to the very real physical harm that one encounters with non compliance from those serving to protect the general public. In arguing over privacy and civil liberties we offer no support to those attempting to safeguard that privacy and those liberties we have come to take for granted. There is a cost and there will always be a threat to that cost, but I would rather accept the upfront risk of problematic technology than encounter another 911.
Latest Government Technology News