January 15, 2008 By Adam Stone
IT managers rely on pivot tables, a powerful yet often overlooked function in Excel. Pivot tables summarize long lists of data without requiring the user to write formulas or copy cells. The tool allows a user to sift data by age, location, ethnicity and other variables easily.
In this way, IT staffers are turning out new data sets every 10 days, which social service workers at ground level can then apply to MST to generate maps as needed. Right now, nearly 30 of the state's 43 social service agencies are running MST. The system continues to roll out statewide, Cox said.
This isn't the first time mapping applications have been used to improve efficiencies within a social service program.
Take the example of food stamps in Mississippi. In 2005, the Mississippi Department of Human Services announced it would implement a GIS program to curtail fraud, the idea being to track the distances customers traveled in order to use their EBT cards.
In California, the Department of Social Services teamed with the nonprofit Stuart Foundation to chart data about children in the state's Child Welfare System. The database calculates outcome measures, including such line-items as maltreatment in foster care homes and time to reunification with family.
The system also generates maps indicating the distances between removals and placements of foster kids throughout the state. To do this, it relies on an in-house GIS along with other technologies.
Those familiar with such efforts say there are pros and cons, the cons being mostly cost. GIS packages can easily run millions of dollars, said Daniel Webster, a research specialist in the Child Welfare Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley.
In addition to the cost, GIS systems are often complex, requiring a certain level of technical sophistication. "So there are finance and technical barriers that keep a lot of people from using it," Webster said.
Washington's use of MST, on the other hand, delivers readily accessible technology: an application that is both affordable and easy to use for the program coordinators who generate maps at the local level.
"A lot of the more sophisticated packages will have more powerful features, more powerful analysis tools, but they don't need that type of special analysis capability [in the foster care system]. They just need to be able to make maps," Webster said.
Perhaps equally important is that the off-the-shelf program was designed with the visual element in mind. MST meets the user at the graphical level, with all the charts and data left to run behind the scenes. "People don't go into human services because they are comfortable with anything that has to do with tables and numbers," Webster said.
It's just the opposite, in fact. "They come in because they want to help people," he said. "They don't want to deal with math or statistics."
Facts on the Ground
Now people can see graphic evidence of kids leaving their neighborhoods as they travel through the foster care system. Will the locals therefore volunteer their homes as foster way stations? Those who work at the community level say it could very well happen.
Some say the system could serve to focus caseworkers' attention on the geographic aspect of placement. While geographic data has been available before, "It's not the kind of thing where I can just get it in five minutes," said Jill Kinney, a regional coordinator in Washington's Family to Family program, a local child-welfare initiative.
Foster care needs "tend to cluster, and they don't always cluster where the staff would predict," she said. By highlighting problem areas, MST maps could help caseworkers pinpoint their efforts and work more efficiently.
At the community level, social service organizers say they have been impressed by
You may use or reference this story with attribution and a link to
http://www.govtech.com/health/Mapping-Software-Helps-Washington-State-Find.html
Great story. S&T can be purchased for about $30, $99 with the GPS receiver hardware. The $150 price in the story seems a bit steep.
But what happens when the parent or abuser sees them in the community, but living with another family. Will there be backlash? Will that child and their foster family be stalked and harassed? Is it sometimes better to totally remove the child in danger and send them to a new area? How can a child at risk, be taken to another household in that area, if the area is a high crime, drug paralyzed, and dangerous community. Out of the frying pan and into the fire. This is why, I believe that statistical information aids in making those decisions.
Yes, the price has come down for Microsoft Streets and Trips since I started using it for data in 2005.
Every neighborhood has its own strengths and legacy. There are champions for children in every neighborhood that can be depended upon. A placement decision by definition can only be made when it is safe to do so. A 'safe decision' to return the child back to the neighborhood is made when family, extended family, community, Child Protection Officials and Foster Parents are engaged and motivated to follow through with the changes that ensure more safety than would normally be afforded to the child. It is, in this case, fortunate for the child that it is also a familiar placement. This safe and familiar placement can be made more much more often than it is presently. It does improve outcomes. In fact, the biggest variable statistically shows that placing the child back in the neighborhood when it is safe and using a Family to Family approach yields better outcomes. Please study the statistics published for Cleveland and the surrounding county on their web site.
By way of knowing the true genesis of this project, it would be worth reviewing this article in the Child Welfare League of America (published in late 2005): http://www.cwla.org/voice/0509briefs.htm
We have safeguards against such things. Only a safe placement will do.