Jun 22, 2009, By Bill Vass
The public sector, especially the federal government, has been slow to embrace what may be the single most important innovation sweeping the technology world -- open source software. It holds the "keys to the kingdom" in making government more efficient in conducting its business, serving citizens securely and better managing tax dollars spent on technology.
Open source technology enables both equal access and the freedom to distribute a technology's source code -- in essence the "language" on which it's built. It includes an accepted set of standards that allow a business or government the freedom to move its critical data and IT services on, off and in-between products from different companies, whenever it chooses.
Think about your car. In the U.S. we've agreed to drive on the right-hand side of the road. We've agreed on traffic rules and signals. The gas pedal goes on the right and the brake goes on the left. These are our "open standards" for driving. Still, we're free to purchase any car from any car company we wish. And if we're not happy with the car we bought, or we don't think the price is fair, we're free to shop around. We don't need a new driver's license or to invest time and money learning to drive a different type of car.
It's the same with the global commercial open source movement. And the first major benefit the government can realize from this freedom and openness is reduced costs. Commercial open source technologies cost less than closed, proprietary technologies. Open source software can typically be downloaded for free. And open source technology and open standards allow multiple vendors to compete fairly for the government's business. Such competition brings more choices, better products and lower prices.
The cost savings are astounding. In the UK, where the government recently announced it will accelerate the use of commercial open source software, it's estimated that the move away from proprietary technologies could save £600 million a year. Here in the U.S., a recent report from MeriTalk estimates federal IT savings could reach "$3.7 billion from open source." These cost savings can't be ignored, especially when taxpayer dollars are footing the bill.
Think, if you will, about government procurement scandals of the past involving unexamined purchases that led to disclosures of $10,000 toilet seats and wastebaskets and other irresponsible spending. Proprietary software is this decade's procurement scandal waiting to happen with government agencies wasting millions on proprietary technologies when equivalent open source technologies are available for just thousands of dollars, or in some cases, free. Creating a formal policy around open source use and procurement brings more transparency and a level playing field to the government technology bidding process.
The second major consideration is security. Ensuring the security and integrity of our government's sensitive data and critical IT systems is crucial. Commercial open source technologies provide more security than their proprietary counterparts because open development means hidden breaches aren't buried in the code. They are ferreted out more quickly and efficiently, and rigorous testing ensures three-letter agency security levels.
Finally, open technologies enable every citizen to better communicate with our government, do business with government agencies, receive government services and access public data. This happens when all government and "citizen-owned" content share common standards and don't require the use of proprietary technologies (word processors and spreadsheets, Web browsers or e-mail clients) to access it.
By no means is open source a new idea. Open source technologies and solutions such as Java, Linux, Solaris, MySQL, Apache and OpenOffice are well established and well proven the world over -- literally billions of people are using them. Some of the world's most successful companies -- like Google and Facebook --
Read real world deployments of technology in government from our sponsors.
View All Industry Solutions
Browse hundreds of public sector career opportunities in GovTech's new jobs section. Popular job searches: government IT, public safety, GIS, transportation, CIO, security, health
Comments
As far as security goes, open source has shown to be MUCH more secure than closed code. The latest DHS studies show from the National Vulnerability Database so that even when taking into account the number of distributions of a product COSS is about 7x more secure. You can see the data here: blogs.sun.com/BVass
I agree with Bill that open source represents a vast pol of potential savings. My company has estimated that the cost to develop all the open source software that exists on the internet at $387 billion, and US application development savings of $22 billion. Other countries are happy to tap this valuable resource. We also maintain a free code search website (koders.com) for open source. China and India represent two of the countries in the top 5 using the site. Open source is not the answer for everything but it's common sense not to reinvent the wheel.
With open source being open you are more vulnerable to attacks because the attacker has access to the source code. Also if you do not review and compile the source code yourself you will be unsure of any holes left in the code. this will require a staff of developers to review all new version of the opensource code. The government can not afford to put the trust into open source in my opinion.
Most government software is terribly bad, inefficient and insecure, it is this that needs to be replaced. Most ppl wouldnt care if it ran and did its job on a zx spectrum. Its these systems that are not opensource.....
Latest Government Technology News