March 10, 2009 By Matt Williams
CIO Teri Takai is ready to give California a major IT tune-up, one that's even bigger than the consolidation she performed as Michigan's CIO.
Takai told Government Technology on Tuesday that California's $40 billion budget deficit has driven home the importance of a statewide IT consolidation.
"I think it was obviously something [Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger] wanted, to make sure that we get efficiencies in government," Takai said, "particularly as we're talking about the revenue crisis that we face, and so this was a part of his overall plan."
On Jan. 16, Schwarzenegger announced the Governor's Reorganization Plan, an 18-point list that would centralize statewide IT operations under an expanded Office of the State Chief Information Officer. Takai and her office would absorb and oversee the Department of Technology Services -- currently managing two of California's largest data centers -- as well as the Office of Information Security and Privacy Protection, and the Department of General Services' telecommunications division, which manages 911 call centers and public safety radio. Under the plan, Chief Information Security Officer Mark Weatherford and Technology Services Director P.K. Agarwal would report to Takai. On Jan. 15, the state released its five-year IT strategic plan, which includes the consolidation plan.
The organizational consolidation, if approved, is projected to save California $1.5 billion, including cost avoidance, over five years. But that's not nearly enough to solve the state's budget woes.
California lawmakers remain at odds about how to solve the budget impasse. Last week, Controller John Chiang said the budget crunch could force the state to delay sending Californians their tax refunds. Schwarzenegger has ordered most state workers to take unpaid furloughs two Fridays each month until summer 2010 in order to dent the state's deficit.
Despite the sobering economic climate, Takai said the IT consolidation won't eliminate positions. "Clearly, as with anyone in IT, those jobs are going to evolve over time, as they've evolved already," Takai said. "So there are going to be different technologies, and you know, potentially, we're going to want to do things like increase project-management skills and increase things like project management and analytics. But there's no intention, as a result of the strategic plan, to change the number of IT employees in the state."

Takai said in addition to the IT reorganization, California will consolidate its e-mail systems and data centers -- the state currently has more than 400,000 square feet of floor space, including 400 data center locations and server rooms.
Takai, who was Michigan's CIO from 2003 to 2007, made her public-sector managerial reputation, in large part, on a consolidation of Michigan's IT services that reduced the state's 25 data centers to only three and also pared down the state's disparate e-mail systems.
But the scale of California's consolidation promises to be bigger. Much bigger.
A May 2008 survey of California's IT structure reveals a large organization that befits California's status as the most populous state. The state has:
o 8,000 to 10,000 IT employees, including 130 CIOs;
o $3 billion in annual IT expenditures;
o more than 100 different e-mail systems and supports 180,000 mailboxes; and
o 9,500 servers that it owns and operates.
Takai said she realizes what worked for Michigan won't necessarily translate to the West Coast.
"We are going to operate here in California -- just because of our size and diversity -- in much more of a 'federated' model rather than a consolidated model. For instance, we are not consolidating IT budgets. Those budgets will still remain in the control of the [individual] business areas. We're not talking about doing any consolidation of personnel, but rather that people will work on common technologies."
You may use or reference this story with attribution and a link to
http://www.govtech.com/pcio/California-CIO-Teri-Takai-IT-Consolidation.html
Re: http://www.govtech.com/gt/591614 Has this number been verified because that is a very misleading statement. There is no way there are 100 different email system (sendmail, Exchange, Groupwise, etc) in state service.
Re: http://www.govtech.com/gt/591614 Has this number been verified because that is a very misleading statement. There is no way there are 100 different email system (sendmail, Exchange, Groupwise, etc) in state service.
Per the previous comment by "Anonymous," Teri Takai has stated publicly this fact several times -- and once when I talked to her on the phone. Thanks for the inquiry!
Per the previous comment by "Anonymous," Teri Takai has stated publicly this fact several times -- and once when I talked to her on the phone. Thanks for the inquiry!
Has it occured to anyone that maybe the 100 different systems could include duplicate systems? (i.e. like several departments running different versions of Exchange). I believe it is possible to have 100 different systems. Teri was my CIO here in Michigan and she would make sure her facts were accurate so I believe her statements are factual.
Has it occured to anyone that maybe the 100 different systems could include duplicate systems? (i.e. like several departments running different versions of Exchange). I believe it is possible to have 100 different systems. Teri was my CIO here in Michigan and she would make sure her facts were accurate so I believe her statements are factual.
Looking at the costs for our department to consolidate our email, it would cost five times more to move our messaging to the data center (considered factors of licensing, hardware, support, Blackberry, etc). How does it save the State money? Where do you think departments get funding? Tax dollars. It is interesting that departments are still on the hook for administration and licensing costs as well as payment for the services. The department that will benefit is DTS, which conveniently will be under the State CIO.
Looking at the costs for our department to consolidate our email, it would cost five times more to move our messaging to the data center (considered factors of licensing, hardware, support, Blackberry, etc). How does it save the State money? Where do you think departments get funding? Tax dollars. It is interesting that departments are still on the hook for administration and licensing costs as well as payment for the services. The department that will benefit is DTS, which conveniently will be under the State CIO.