January 13, 2008 By Chad Vander Veen
OK, it's 2008. Now it makes sense to actually pay attention to the presidential candidates, but there's really no need. They're all terrible, and whatever you want changed won't be. Want us out of Iraq? Not happening. Increased federal funding for technology initiatives? Forget it. Higher/lower/flat taxes? No, no, no. Although at press time, we can "choose" from 16 people, 15 of them are virtually indistinguishable - something this expanded campaign season has repeatedly proven.
Clinton, Obama, Rudy, Edwards, Romney - does it really matter who wins? Social issues aside, will any of them champion technology to increase government efficiency or reduce Washington's crippling bureaucracy? Who among them will accomplish what you're often called to achieve - do more with less? The probable answer is none.
Presidential politics ceased being about servicing the public and is solely about attaining and wielding power. It's often said that people get the government they deserve. For proof, look no further than Congress. Everyone hates Congress, regardless of which party is in control. Current polling puts Congress' job approval rating at 20 percent. Yet individually, Congress members routinely win high marks from constituents. Why? Because to get elected and stay in office, representatives must condemn pork barrel spending while promising the very same pork barrel spending. This virtually assures gridlock. And it may prove that representative democracy has a finite life span. Since this nation was founded, government has only increased in size. Never has it permanently shrunk. If this trend continues, which it will, the wheels of government will surely grind to a halt.
To worsen matters, those we elect to Congress and the Oval Office have no incentive to change things. Only by perpetuating this trend can they win re-election. To increase government efficiency would require reducing the wasteful spending that wins votes in a representative's district. And if the bacon isn't brought home, someone else who will bring it will get the votes.
Naturally this ship of foolishness needs a captain - a person who can, individually, embody this abortion of democracy. Pick any social issue, and realize that all the lip service candidates give it is nothing more than a distraction to keep you from noticing that all any of them want is power. And thus, you realize why it makes no difference who wins. None of the candidates are average Americans. They all come from money - money that is used to buy power. And the Oval Office is the ultimate goal for those seeking to hold the reins.
Of course, occasionally, there's an outlier, which is why I said 15 of the 16 candidates are interchangeable. This time, Ron Paul is the mistake, the one who slipped through the cracks. Paul seems to truly want to improve government. Which is why he has no chance of winning. People indeed get the government they deserve, and, at least for now, it appears we'll get it.
Happy New Year.
You may use or reference this story with attribution and a link to
http://www.govtech.com/policy-management/From-Clinton-and-Obama-to-Rudy.html
Thanks for a great article Chad. It so hard getting Ron Paul's message of limited government out there to the masses, and thus such a relief when finding someone that's heard it and understands that all the other candidates are interchangeable. But you're right. People are going to vote for the guy that gets them the biggest piece of the pie. Even if it means bankrupting this great country. Keep spreading the word though. Ron Paul is America's last hope!
There's this old story about a guy sitting along the outskirts of a city and a traveler comes along and asks him what kind of people live there. The guy asks the traveler what kind of people lived in the town he came from. "Cruel, petty and spiteful," said the traveler. "You will find them the same here," said the guy. Another traveler came along and asked the same question. The guy again asked the traveler what kind of people lived in the town he had come from. "Honest, caring, hard working," said the traveler. "You will find them the same here," said the guy. I think you got the government you deserved. Mine doesn't look quite that bad, even though it needs some work. You like Ron Paul? Start working on his campaign and quit contributing to the "everything is bad, so let's just quit" mentality.