IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Google to Retire Google+ Social Platform?

After merely four years after it began, Google+ -- which was supposed to create a huge social network with a billion or more users -- will be removed as "the mechanism by which people share and engage within other Google products."

(TNS) -- It’s the final nail in the coffin. On Monday, Google officially retired its Google+ service merely four years after it began. Google+, which was supposed to create a huge social network with a billion or more users, proved no match to Facebook, Twitter and other social networks. Brad Horowitz, vice-president of Streams, Photos and Sharing (that includes Google+), wrote in a Google+ update, “We’re going to retire Google+ as the mechanism by which people share and engage within other Google products.”

Google+ was started with two main goals: one, Google+ aspired to be both a “platform layer that unified Google’s sharing models,” and two, a product, stream or app in its own right. While the goals were well-intentioned, the company did not anticipate the user experience that found the product confusing.

Among the most confusing — and irritating — was the requirement that a user have a Google+ account and profile to log into many other Google services like Google Photos. The most controversial and disliked was the integration of Google+ with YouTube, which meant that leaving a comment on YouTube (something users had been doing successfully for years) suddenly and unexpectedly required “joining Google+.” No wonder then, YouTube is one of the first places where Google is withdrawing this requirement. According to a blog on the company’s website, YouTube will be one of the first products to make this change. We decided it’s time to fix this, not only in YouTube, but across a user’s entire experience at Google. We want to formally retire the notion that a Google+ membership is required for anything at Google … other than using Google+ itself.

“They thought they could muscle their way to becoming the next big social network,” said Aaron Goldman, chief marketing officer of 4C Insights, a social-media data firm. “They are finally figuring out what this is.”

Some of the consequences of this shift in thinking have already been deployed. For example, Google Photos, a photo- and video-storage service launched earlier this year, lets users share without a Google+ profile. “Google Photos not only doesn’t require a Google+ account, but as much of the functionality as possible doesn’t even require an account at all,” explains Horowitz. Other things people often share on social networks, like their location, are being moved to other Google apps like the messaging and video-chat service Hangouts, according to the blog.

Going by the figures, Google+ never managed to catch up to competition. In late 2013, according to statistics reported by the company, Google+ had 300 million monthly active users (MAUs), although exactly how active these people were was always questionable. During the same period, Facebook had more than 1 billion MAUs, which has crossed an unparalleled 1.4 billion MAUs now.

So what does this announcement mean for Google+ as a product? The company believes that relieved of the notion of integrating with every other product at Google, Google+ will now focus on connecting users around specific interests. Aspects of the product that don’t serve this agenda have been, or will be, retired. “In the coming months, a Google Account will be all you’ll need to share content, communicate with contacts, create a YouTube channel and more, all across Google,” the company said.

The company says that users will see these changes being rolled out in stages over several months. While they won’t happen overnight, they’re right for Google’s users — those who are on Google+ every single day, and those who aren’t.

©2015 the Mint (New Delhi). Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.