Government Technology

New Fuel Standards Nearly Double Car Efficiency


August 29, 2012 By

Automakers will be required to manufacture vehicles that have an average fuel efficiency of 54.5 miles per gallon — nearly double the fuel efficiency of today's vehicles — by 2025 under new rules announced by the Barack Obama administration Aug. 28.

The White House projects that the standards will save the average American family $8,000 over the lifetime of a new vehicle, but critics argue that the new regulations could increase the price of new vehicles.

"Today is a monumental day for the American people," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said during a press call on Aug. 28. "Everyone wins when we reduce fuel use and carbon emissions."

The change comes a year after the Obama administration proposed the new standards — which will apply to cars and light trucks — as a way to cut down on how much Americans pay at the pump, make the country less dependent on oil, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa P. Jackson told reporters the new standards will likely do more to reduce greenhouse gas emissions than any action previously taken by any administration. When Obama took office, fuel economy standards for passenger cars had been unchanged since 1985.

Thirteen major automakers expressed support for the new standards, which the White House touted as a way to spur innovation as it works to develop technologies to comply with the new regulations.

The new standards cover vehicles manufactured in model years 2017 to 2025, gradually ramping up the miles-per-gallon requirements each year. It's the second long-term increase in fuel efficiency mandated under the administration. In 2010, Obama announced new requirements through 2016 that would eventually increase efficiency to 35.5 mpg.

Despite support from many automakers and environmental groups, critics worry about how the deal was made and the cost to consumers.

House Oversight Committee Chair Darrell Issa accused the administration of failing to act transparently as it developed the rules and negotiated with automakers. Earlier this month, his committee staff compiled a report criticizing the process by which the administration "strong-armed auto manufacturers at the expense of consumer choice, safety and affordability."

The report raises questions about the cost to consumers of new vehicles that will have to incorporate the latest technology to improve fuel efficiency. The report cites an email between officials with General Motors — who agreed to the deal — saying that the cost of vehicles to both consumers and automakers "was clearly not a significant concern of the regulators." The report also says that the administration is overly optimistic about the speed at which new technologies will be available.

The EPA's Jackson told reporters that, "in every scenario we've run," the savings from lower fuel costs would "more than make up for any increase in the cost of an automobile."

Some critics have also pointed out safety concerns with the new rules. Jeremy Anwyl, vice president of automotive news publisher Edmunds.com, wrote that fuel efficiency is achieved by reducing vehicle weight — but larger, heavier vehicles tend to be safer. He predicted traffic fatalities would increase as a result of the efficiency push. "When we want higher mileage and fewer fatalities and injuries, we are pulling in opposite directions," he wrote last year.

Administration officials say manufacturers can meet the new requirements without sacrificing safety.

This article was originally published by Governing.com.


You may use or reference this story with attribution and a link to
http://www.govtech.com/transportation/New-Fuel-Standards-Car-Efficiency.html


| More

Comments

M Shiels    |    Commented August 30, 2012

In Europe many cars are already getting 70 miles per gallon. Americans should be outraged that these cars are not permitted here. ( Check out VW Golf diesel performance for example).

Viktor Borge    |    Commented August 30, 2012

You sure that isn't KM per gallon in Europe? VW TDI's are all over the US. Here is the 2012 Golf TDI specs Fuel economy: 30 mpg city/42 mpg highway/41.7 mpg test

Mark    |    Commented August 31, 2012

Please see the article "Debunked: High-Mileage Vehicles Not Blocked from US Market" at http://pesn.com/2012/05/01/9602085_VW_not_allowed_by_US_government_to_sell_high_mileage_cars_to_US_consumers/

m shiels    |    Commented August 31, 2012

I've read the Debunked article... The oil industry claims that these fuel efficient vehicles in Europe do not meet the high US emissions regulations... Per gallon that may be true (by approx only 10%). Given that these cars travel TWICE as far on a gallon, the net effect is that they are actually MUCH greener than their US counterparts. And the km vs miles..No... I travelled over a thousand miles in England, and I'm absolutely sure they were miles , not km. VW TDIs here in the US are not the same as the ones in Europe, or I'd buy one tomorrow. Check out VW dealerships in the UK if you don't believe they get 70 miles per gallon. I'm not kidding, you ought to be outraged about this!

m. shiels    |    Commented August 31, 2012

Here you go... http://www.worldcarfans.com/109102822713/743mpg-vw-golf-bluemotion-launched-in-uk

Chris 54    |    Commented September 4, 2012

@Viktor The Golf Blue Motion gets 73 mpg US (88 mpg UK or 3.2 liters / 100 km). @Mark You debunking "proof" wasn't worth the time it took to read it.

BC    |    Commented September 4, 2012

It is not just that fuel-efficient models are blocked and its not just Federal regulations in the way. I was talking to my mechanic about fuel economy the other day and he mentioned that when he adjusted some of the emmissions control functions on his diesel pickup (a Ford btw), he gained a few mpg but still not to the level older vehicles with no emmission controls could achieve. His truck probably no longer meets California's very strict standards but is still legal here. I believe this required making adjustments with the vehicle's onboard computer using specialized tools, so it is probably beyond your average person. Also, I doubt that automakers will roll vehicles off the assembly line in a configuration that prevents them from being sold in some states, so the strictest standards with their associated efficiency costs prevail.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.


Collaboration for the Public Sector



Collaborative Justice: Transforming Criminal Justice Services Through Unified Collaboration
This issue brief examines video collaboration in every stage of the human justice process, demonstrating how this technology can not only make services more efficient, affordable, and accessible.

Cloud-Based Services Accelerate Public Sector Adoption of Video Collaboration
Today, thanks to new cloud technologies and high-quality networks, mobile video services - which provide not only cost savings but which help governmental interactions become more efficient - are more feasible than ever before.

Modernization as a Service: Acquiring IT through Innovative Procurement

Five Ways Collaboration is Driving Government Performance

Mobile Video Collaboration: The New Business Reality