IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Here's How County Governments Spend Their IT Budgets

County governments devote much more of their budgets to staff, and less to services.

County governments are a very different beast from state governments when it comes to technology.

According to the Center for Digital Government,* which surveyed counties across the U.S. this year as part of the Digital Counties project, the average participating county said it spent 46 percent of its technology budget on internal staff.

That far outpaces states, which on average spent one-third of their budgets on staff.

Counties also spent more on telecommunications and hardware than states. Together, those three categories made up 75 percent of county budgets, versus only 53 percent for states.

Conversely, states devote more of their budgets to software and IT services (38 percent altogether) than counties (24 percent).

Much like with the states project, the numbers represent a unique look into public IT budgets. Because governments use different terminology and have different organizational structures, it can be difficult to compare IT spending between them using budgets.

CDG doesn’t publish exact numbers for how many counties participated in the survey.

For more statistics from Digital Counties, click here. For winners, click here.

*The Center for Digital Government is part of e.Republic, Government Technology's parent company.

Editor's note: This story was corrected to clarify that the number of participants in the survey is unreleased information.

Ben Miller is the associate editor of data and business for Government Technology. His reporting experience includes breaking news, business, community features and technical subjects. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in journalism from the Reynolds School of Journalism at the University of Nevada, Reno, and lives in Sacramento, Calif.
Special Projects
Sponsored Articles
  • How the State of Washington teamed with Deloitte to move to a Red Hat footprint within 100 days.
  • The State of Michigan’s Department of Technology, Management, and Budget (DTMB) reduced its application delivery times to get digital services to citizens faster.

  • Sponsored
    Like many governments worldwide, the City and County of Denver, Colorado, had to act quickly to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. To support more than 15,000 employees working from home, the government sought to adapt its new collaboration tool, Microsoft Teams. By automating provisioning and scaling tasks with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, an agentless, human-readable automation tool, Denver supported 514% growth in Teams use and quickly launched a virtual emergency operations center (EOC) for government leaders to respond to the pandemic.
  • Sponsored
    Microsoft Teams quickly became the business application of choice as state and local governments raced to equip remote teams and maintain business continuity during the COVID-19 lockdown. But in the rush to deploy Teams, many organizations overlook, ignore or fail to anticipate some of the administrative hurdles to successful adoption. As more organizations have matured their use of Teams, a set of lessons learned has emerged to help agencies ensure a successful Teams rollout – or correct course on existing implementations.