IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Best of the Web & Digital Government Achievement Awards 2011

Digital Government's Finest Showcased by the Center for Digital Government 2011

Digital Government’s Finest Showcased by the Center for Digital Government

SACRAMENTO, CA ( Sept. 1, 2011)  e.Republic’s Center for Digital Government has announced the 2011 winners of its annual Best of the Web and Digital Government Achievement Awards. 

In its 16th year, Best of the Web (BOW) recognizes outstanding government portals and websites based on innovation, functionality and efficiency. BOW first place winners are Arkansas (state), Seattle, (city) and Stearns County, Minn. (county).  

The Digital Government Achievement Awards (DGAA) highlight outstanding agency and department websites and applications.  Forty-three awards in six categories were given this year.
“The goal of every government website is to provide online services and information to constituents,” said Cathilea Robinett, executive director of the Center for Digital Government. “However, this year’s winners have taken the power of the Web to the next level – combining clear communication, design aesthetic and easy navigation. Their foresight and leadership is creating unforeseen opportunities in government-to-citizen interaction and positioning the portal as a critical piece of public service delivery. The Center thanks them for their continuing innovation and congratulates them on their achievements!”


State Portal Category:

1st Place: Arkansas
2nd Place: Utah  
3rd Place: Indiana
4th Place: Rhode Island   
5th Place: Texas



City Portal Category:

1st Place: City of Seattle, Wash.
2nd Place: Louisville Metro Government, Ky.  
3rd Place: City of Arvada, Colo.    
4th Place: City of Riverside, Calif.   
5th Place: City of Danville, Va.


City of Fort Collins, Colo.
City of Mesa, Ariz.
City of Raleigh, N.C.

City of Richmond, Va.   
City of Tampa, Fla.

County Portal Category:

1st Place: Stearns County, Minn.
2nd Place: Oakland County, Mich.    
3rd Place: Miami-Dade County, Fla.   
4th Place: Pinellas County, Fla.   
5th Place: Roanoke County, Va.


Clark County, Nev.
County of Alameda, Calif.   
Fairfax County, Va.  
King County, Wash.   
Monroe County, N.Y.


Government-to-business category

Air Resources Board Equipment Registration System (ARBER), CalEPA
Maine One-Stop Background Check  
Online Assistance System for Insurer Submittals (OASIS), California
Oregon ePermitting
The Automated Collection Enhancement System (ACES), California (secure tax system site)

Honorable Mention:
Utah Online Notary

Government-to-citizen City government category

CCMobile, Corpus Christi, TX
Citizen Participation in City Government via Keyword Alerts, Georgetown, TX
Mayor's Participation Action and Communication Team, Richmond, VA
Richmond Grows Gardens Online Permit Application

Government-to-citizen County government category

eTownHall, Pinellas County, FL
Mobile Touch, Oakland County, Mich.
My Bexar Community Dashboard, Bexar County, TX
My Waterworks Account Manager (MyWAM), Los Angeles County, CA
North Coastal and North Inland Region Video Interviewing, San Diego County, CA
Stearns County Sheriff Public Safety Services

Honorable Mention:
BAAQMD Website, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, CA

Government-to-citizen State and Federal government category
Winners: Mobile Portal and Online Services Suite, U.S. Department of Labor
Michigan Bridges
Nebraska ClickDMV
Oregon Open Data (
PA Compass
Utah Online Voter Registration    

Honorable Mentions:
Crystal Cove EduGator, California
Montana Connections
Serving Californians Wirelessly Through the Website

Government-to-government category

Anonymous Wireless Address Matching for Travel Speeds, Houston TranStar
Boston Legislation Information Management System (LIMS)
California Courts Protective Order Registry   
Clark County, NV Integrated Justice Information System (CC-IJIS)    
Common Integrated Justice System (CIJS), Texas Conference of Urban Counties

Honorable Mentions:
GeoSpace - SOA Enabled Geospatial Infrastructure for Whole of Singapore Government (Intranet site)
Portage County, OH Enterprise-Wide GIS
Salt Lake City, UT Police Records Collaboration

Government internal category

Centralized Transcription Services, California
Collaboration Breeds Success: California Web Refresh Effort
Data Center Consolidation and Relocation Project, California
HCDA Mobile Criminal History, Harris County, TX (secure site)
Snow Operations Map, Overland Park, KS

Honorable Mentions:
Employee Intranet, Arvada, CO (Intranet site)
Green Output Online Project (GO-Online), California

The Center for Digital Government is a national research and advisory institute on information technology policies and best practices in state and local government. The Center is a division of e.Republic, a national publishing, event and research company focused on smart media for public sector innovation.

Janet Grenslitt
Director of Surveys and Awards


Special Projects
Sponsored Articles
  • Sponsored
    Smart cities could transform urban living for the better. However, in order to mitigate the risks of cyber threats that can be exacerbated by inadequately secured and mobile edge computing (MEC) technologies, government officials should be aware of smart cities security concerns associated with their supporting infrastructure.
  • Sponsored
    How the convergence of security and networking is accelerating government agencies journey to the cloud.
  • Sponsored
    Microsoft Teams quickly became the business application of choice as state and local governments raced to equip remote teams and maintain business continuity during the COVID-19 lockdown. But in the rush to deploy Teams, many organizations overlook, ignore or fail to anticipate some of the administrative hurdles to successful adoption. As more organizations have matured their use of Teams, a set of lessons learned has emerged to help agencies ensure a successful Teams rollout – or correct course on existing implementations.
  • Sponsored
    Five Key Criteria for Selecting the Right Technology Solution for Communications and Notifications