IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

People and Process: What CIOs Find the Hardest to Modernize

State technology leaders like Colorado Chief Technology Officer David McCurdy and California Chief Information Officer Amy Tong had plenty to say about roadblocks on the path to digital transformation.

Ask any chief information officer in government and they're likely to tell you that their organization is in some stage of modernization or digital transformation. Even if most or all of their legacy systems have enjoyed a recent update, there are always improvements that can be made using technology to optimize operations and service to citizens. Rightfully, CIOs play a vital role in helping lead those projects.

At the annual National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO) conference last month in San Diego, we asked state technology leaders which transformation efforts most often run into trouble. In other words, what's the most difficult thing to modernize in state IT?

Colorado CTO David McCurdy said it's difficult to get the workforce to understand that technology enables an overhaul of process too, and that the end result is a net positive. 

"The hardest thing is getting people out of that mindset that we must reproduce this thing one for one when technology allows them to completely wipe out or change for the betterment of the whole interaction or the process," he said. 

California CIO Amy Tong said modernizing technology is "more straightforward" than updating business processes. And while she feels the effort to update processes is well worth it, moving the organization and its people toward transformation is cumbersome and time-consuming.

"It's a must do, in my mind," she said.

Government Technology editor Noelle Knell has more than 15 years of writing and editing experience, covering public projects, transportation, business and technology. A California native, she has worked in both state and local government, and is a graduate of the University of California, Davis, with majors in political science and American history. She can be reached via email and on Twitter. Follow @GovTechNoelle
Special Projects
Sponsored Articles
  • How the State of Washington teamed with Deloitte to move to a Red Hat footprint within 100 days.
  • The State of Michigan’s Department of Technology, Management, and Budget (DTMB) reduced its application delivery times to get digital services to citizens faster.

  • Sponsored
    Like many governments worldwide, the City and County of Denver, Colorado, had to act quickly to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. To support more than 15,000 employees working from home, the government sought to adapt its new collaboration tool, Microsoft Teams. By automating provisioning and scaling tasks with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, an agentless, human-readable automation tool, Denver supported 514% growth in Teams use and quickly launched a virtual emergency operations center (EOC) for government leaders to respond to the pandemic.
  • Sponsored
    Microsoft Teams quickly became the business application of choice as state and local governments raced to equip remote teams and maintain business continuity during the COVID-19 lockdown. But in the rush to deploy Teams, many organizations overlook, ignore or fail to anticipate some of the administrative hurdles to successful adoption. As more organizations have matured their use of Teams, a set of lessons learned has emerged to help agencies ensure a successful Teams rollout – or correct course on existing implementations.