Government Technology

Will Safety Issues Ground Police Use of Unmanned Drones?




A General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. MQ-1L Predator A. Photo courtesy of "cliff1066"/Flickr Creative Commons.

February 7, 2012 By

Unmanned aircraft can provide a number of tactical advantages for police, particularly in situations that require stealthy observation. But as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) works on proposed regulations for these vehicles, aviation experts believe safety issues still need to be addressed before widespread use takes off.

Chief among those concerns is the absence of a pilot to make decisions if an in-flight emergency arises. Whether it’s a computer malfunction or a potential for collision with another object, the lack of a pilot in the cockpit to respond to a situation could have disastrous consequences when it comes to safety both in the air and on the ground.

Interest in unmanned drones – officially known as unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) – is growing among law enforcement agencies, which see the technology as an effective method for expanding surveillance and enforcement activities.

Dan Stratman, pilot consultant for Aviation Litigation Consulting, said the problem with unmanned aircraft is that applying defensive measures or the same type of common sense a pilot would use while in the air is not the same while remotely controlling an aircraft.

“If you are a pilot inside an airplane and the engine quits, you can look around and find an open area to put the airplane down in to avoid harming people on the ground,” Stratman said. “With these drones, I’m not sure how they would do something like that.”

Peter B. Field, an aviation consultant with 48 years of flying experience, agreed. He explained that while a pilot on the ground technically has control of an unmanned airplane, its more “partial control,” particularly if something breaks while in flight, or communication with the vehicle is interrupted.

“It’s when the link between the between the ground station and the aircraft is lost [that’s the problem],” Field said. “You don’t have a sentient being on board the aircraft who already has imprinted in his memory what to do if he loses communication … you’ve got an airplane out there that nobody can control.”

According to Dan Elwell, vice president of civil aviation at the Aerospace Industries Association that’s where the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) comes in. He explained that NextGen is a satellite air traffic control system that will replace the FAA’s legacy radar system that has been in use since the 1960s. 

Once that is in place, he believed it’ll make integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the aviation equation much easier, because aircraft will transmit to each other where they are, instead of a plane transmitting to a controller, who has to “connect the dots” between an aircraft and the available airspace.

Despite the issues, law enforcement agencies remain high on the technology. Although the project ultimately didn’t pan out due to cost, police in Ogden, Utah, flirted with the idea of an unmanned police blimp, going as far as getting a certificate of authorization — required by the FAA for anything that flies over 400 feet. high — to give the blimp a trial run.

Police in North Dakota also found the technology useful. Borrowing a Predator B spy aircraft from Grand Forks Air Force Base to assist in locating three armed suspects accused of stealing cattle. The Los Angeles Times reported that local law enforcement has used the plane a few different times since June 2011 for surveillance purposes.

What does the FAA have to say about unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and their increasing use? Not so much this year, so far.

The FAA was to issue proposed new rules for UAS in national airspace earlier this year, but has pushed back those rules until later in 2012, according to a statement from Alison Duquette, a spokesperson for the administration.

Stratman said one of the hurdles is the integration of UAS into normal air traffic. He explained that all commercial airliners have traffic collision avoidance systems (TCAS) and while private personal planes usually don’t, they have transponders that send out a signal that TCAS can pick up so they avoid any potential collisions.

That technology, or some version of it, needs to be a part of the evolutionary process of unmanned aircraft in order for UAS to more safely integrate with the rest of the air traffic in the skies.

Elwell agreed.

“You’ve got to get UAS technology and computer algorithms to the point where they effectively see other aircraft in all conditions and do the proper response to avoid when they sense other aircraft,” he said.


You may use or reference this story with attribution and a link to
http://www.govtech.com/public-safety/Will-Safety-Issues-Ground-Police-Use-of-Unmanned-Drones.html


| More

Comments

Robert Checchio    |    Commented February 8, 2012

While the equipping of drones with ADS-B Out transmitters may seem like a way to make their use safer, I have my doubts. Drones are likely to operate in the same airspace used by the very pilots who are placed at the greatest risk by drones: VFR aircraft flying at relatively low altitudes. These aircraft are the least likely to be equipped with ADS-B In avionics, necessary to receive the signals sent by nearby drones. The likelihood of my deciding to upgrade my Piper Archer with ultra-expensive ADS-B In avionics is extremely small. So I will be at great risk if drones are operating in my area. Elwell's comments fail to address the tens of thousands of aircraft that will never be equipped with ADS-B In.

James Bond    |    Commented February 8, 2012

For more information on blimps see: www.hybridairship.net or if you just want a Helium sniffing laugh try my Gasbags lighter than air comedy web site: www.hybridblimp.net

dr spock    |    Commented February 9, 2012

I guess they will have to make a law for you not to operate your aircraft until you fork over your spare kidney to buy the ADS-B.

dr spock    |    Commented February 9, 2012

I dont get this article as most articles here. Is this for it or against? Are they saying the FAA is antiquated and get up to date? All I see is that once they are updated, it will be all fine. Really? so when this thing looses communication with the controller, engine fails, etc, this thing can fall on top of a house, a car, a playground. It can kill anybody, what then? I guess they can call it, an act of God.

SoutheastUS    |    Commented February 10, 2012

Well, dr spock, I suppose the article meant to leave the "deciding if it's a good idea or not" up to the readers. Personally, I don't think it is a good idea in civilian airspace for all the reasons Robert meantioned. Too many small aircraft without the requisit warning avionics to avoid crashes with UAS craft being the most important, in my opinion. Now watch the government require ADS-B In avionics the way they now require airbags in cars.

Jim OConnor    |    Commented February 14, 2012

For public safety/law enforcement use UAS assets should be used for SA ( Situational Awareness ) use to have up to a 400' ceiling, below FAA regulations that can give police and first responders " eyes on the target " or disaster scene. This can facilitate deployment of personnel and assets to address the situation. A secure aerial wireless mesh network showing the sitation from the site/scene back to command and control can be invaluable in savings lives and addressing any situation.

sonotboi    |    Commented February 14, 2012

I understand the "at last" we are pushing military hardware into civilian hands. There is very limited use for these devices in the local police toolbag. Let's leave them "on call" from the state level and not blow our very hard fought UASI dollars on this kind of BS in Podunk USA! The I want it because I can have it mentality is holding us back. Let us move forward and truly be prepared.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

Collaboration for the Public Sector



Collaborative Justice: Transforming Criminal Justice Services Through Unified Collaboration
This issue brief examines video collaboration in every stage of the human justice process, demonstrating how this technology can not only make services more efficient, affordable, and accessible.

Cloud-Based Services Accelerate Public Sector Adoption of Video Collaboration
Today, thanks to new cloud technologies and high-quality networks, mobile video services - which provide not only cost savings but which help governmental interactions become more efficient - are more feasible than ever before.

Modernization as a Service: Acquiring IT through Innovative Procurement

Five Ways Collaboration is Driving Government Performance

Mobile Video Collaboration: The New Business Reality