A coalition of 16 cities, including Carson and Torrance, pitched the fiber-optic cable ring as one way to improve congestion by allowing government employees to telecommute and by helping to synchronize traffic lights.
The $4.4-million proposal has raised the ire of business groups and transit advocates, who say broadband internet should not qualify for funding through Measure M, the sales tax increase for transportation projects.
Critics are demanding that Metropolitan Transportation Authority directors delay a decision or withhold funding from the project at their Thursday meeting.
“While a fiber optic network may be a worthy project, it is not a transportation project,” said Maria Salinas, the president and chief executive of the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce. The Metro board’s funding the fiber project through Measure M is a “highly questionable decision,” she said.
The South Bay Cities Council of Governments, the joint powers authority that represents 16 cities and portions of Los Angeles County, first asked Metro for funding in February.
Officials said in application materials that a ring of fiber-optic cables connecting municipal locations across the South Bay could smooth traffic flow and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Faster internet would create “trips not taken,” they said, encouraging telecommuting and creating a way to handle more municipal services digitally.
At first, Metro’s planning and engineering staff balked at the proposal. In a letter in mid-April, Metro Chief Executive Phil Washington told South Bay officials that Metro would need “sufficient additional justification” to fund the project through sales tax dollars.
The next week, four Metro directors — Los Angeles County Supervisors Janice Hahn and Hilda Solis, Inglewood Mayor James T. Butts Jr. and Duarte Councilman John Fasana — introduced a motion to authorize funding for the broadband project from a pot of money reserved for South Bay transportation projects.
The motion passed unanimously, but with a caveat: Within two months, officials from Metro and the South Bay coalition had to agree on a transportation connection.
A group of business and transit groups that had campaigned to support Measure M protested, questioning why Metro would approve a project if the transportation connection was not yet clear.
“Not only does it not pass the smell test, it doesn’t pass the legal test,” said Stuart Waldman, the president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., one of the groups that signed on to a tart letter to the board of directors. “It’s a slippery slope that none of us want to go down.”
South Bay officials and Metro later agreed to connect the fiber-optic ring to traffic data collection centers and traffic monitoring programs operated by Metro, Los Angeles County, Manhattan Beach and Torrance.
The new connections will create redundancy, ensuring that the traffic data networks continue to work in the event of outages or accidents, said Steve Gota, Metro’s lead manager on intelligent transportation systems.
“If we’re really able to make some changes in terms of how lights are functioning, it’s going to have a dramatic impact on people’s commute times,” said Christian Horvath, the chairman of the South Bay Cities coalition and a Redondo Beach councilman.
That has not satisfied critics, who say the project’s connection to transportation improvements is still tenuous.
Tracy Hernandez, the founding chief executive of the Los Angeles County Business Federation, said in an email that the broadband project should not receive sales tax dollars until officials have established “a clearly defined qualified use of Measure M funds.”
“There’s been a lot of — a little bit of criticism about this, and some complaints,” Hahn, who has championed the project, said at a meeting last week. She urged Metro to continue to oversee the project.
Washington, the Metro CEO, said that after some back-and-forth, the project was considered eligible for the funds, adding that “in terms of oversight, and in terms of making sure that things work out, we’ve done that, we’ll continue to that.”
Construction is expected to take nine months to a year. A Los Angeles company, American Dark Fiber, would lay about 30% of the cable and would lease the remaining 70% from companies that have unused cable capacity, said CEO David Daigle.
The system would allow the South Bay’s municipal governments to tap directly into fiber-optic cables and avoid paying a service provider. The service would cost $1,000 a month for speeds of 1 gigabyte per second, he said, a price that is below the market rate because Metro is paying for the lion’s share of the installation costs.
To connect the high-speed internet to residents or businesses, he said, each city would need to contract with the company.
The four Metro projects would be finished within two months of the broadband network’s opening, the agency said.
Business groups have continued to voice concerns, questioning whether the Metro board’s decision to approve the project and then find a transportation connection could allow other, similar projects to receive funding too.
Metro director and Glendale Mayor Ara Najarian said last week at a public meeting that the San Gabriel Valley is interested in a similar fiber network.
“They said, ‘Well, South Bay is doing it, why can’t we do it?’” Najarian said.
©2019 the Los Angeles Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
