February 19, 2013 By Brian Heaton
When Superstorm Sandy wiped out a good chunk of the New Jersey shore just prior to the presidential elections last November, Gov. Chris Christie’s administration issued a directive allowing displaced citizens and first responders to vote electronically. Casting an email or fax vote may seem easy enough, but for some citizens and county election offices, the process wasn’t a walk in the park.
Technology wasn’t a problem -- procedures for voting electronically were already established so that military members and other overseas personnel could receive their ballots and vote by email. But preparing to receive votes from the general populace took around-the-clock efforts from county election staff already battered by the effects of Sandy.
While the top of the ballots that contained federal election choices was already completed because of overseas voters, New Jersey counties had to extend those ballots to include the local races for each voter, which took time. But once that was done, sending out ballots and then qualifying people to vote electronically was a big challenge.
Hudson County Clerk Barbara Netchert explained the biggest issue was that when voters heard the word “email” many who were unaffected by the storm ignored the phrase “displaced by Sandy” and tried to vote electronically instead of going to the polls like normal.
“We were inundated,” Netchert said. “My people could not … keep up with the amount of requests coming into our mailbox. People were then making the decision to email other people within the system just to make sure that it got here. So we had a lot of duplicates and it was just a daunting task.”
Residents and emergency workers “displaced” by Hurricane Sandy could request an application by email or download one off a county’s website. The completed form could be scanned, emailed or faxed to the county elections office. Those applications were reviewed by county election office workers, who had to verify the applicant as an eligible voter.
Once verified, the applicant would receive a ballot by email or fax, with specific instructions on how and when to return it so that their vote would be counted. In just a few days’ time, thousands of voting applications hit the inboxes and offices in various counties. Hudson County received 2,700 applications, while Passaic County handled around 2,000 requests from its own citizens.
Overall, Hudson County processed 1,700 of the 2,700 applications it received, but only 500 people returned accepted ballots. In Passaic County, workers processed approximately 550 out of 2,000, but received just 188 completed ballots.
(Requests for information on the overall number of accepted and tallied email and fax ballots from the state of New Jersey were not returned.)
Passaic County Clerk Kristin Corrado said the low return was likely a result of many non-registered voters thinking they could register and vote at the same time. She added that the situation happened so quickly there just wasn’t time to prepare and communicate as effectively with people as she would have liked.
Netchert agreed. She said her office regretted not having enough time to reach out to those people who submitted a ballot request but ended up not getting one because they didn’t qualify.
“We were so overwhelmed with the email ballot requests coming in, that we had no time when a voter was rejected to stop and go back and email that person and let them know why they weren’t getting a ballot,” Netchert said.
Despite the overall low turnout, Corrado and Netchert believe electronic voting -- by email or another online method -- could work effectively during non-emergency situations in the future. Both said younger voters are pushing for doing things digitally and over time, it will inevitably happen. Last year, California ran a one-month experiment with an online voter registration system that netted more than a half-million new voters. Residents under the age of 25 accounted for 30 percent of all online registrants.
Corrado explained that right now, a person has to be “committed” to vote by email, because the document must be signed, scanned and returned. For some, it’s easier to just head down to a polling place. But that won’t always be the case, as people who are growing up with technology and information at their fingertips may want the convenience of email voting.
For that to happen however, the two county clerks agreed that security would have to be beefed up to ensure the integrity of the process, including the possible inclusion of assigned personal identification numbers.
Netchert admitted that email voting could be harder to secure, but felt times have changed and many young people today are not as concerned about secrecy. They choose to wear their vote on their sleeves, as opposed to older generations that valued secrecy in how they voted.
“Times have changed,” Netchert said. “It’s not like that any more. It’s more modern day politics and people just want to know they can cast a vote.”
Photo courtesy of Shutterstock
This story was originally published on GOVERNING.com
You may use or reference this story with attribution and a link to
http://www.govtech.com/e-government/Has-New-Jersey-Paved-the-Way-for-Voting-via-Email.html

What is Big Data? What can it do for you?
Discover the BI capabilities you already own.
We definitely need to make it easier for people to vote. It's a pain having to bus the illegal aliens to the polls, when they could just vote by email. No need for voter id either, we'll still be able to vote early and often if we have enough email ids.
I agree with Dave in NC. Let's just make it easier for those poor oppressed folks who want to go from polling place to polling place and without an unfair and inaccessible I.D., and then afterward, go to a liquer store and welfare office where they have to show an I.D. All those dead people and their dead pets too; it would be easier for them to vote by email rather than ship their carcasses off in busses. Of course they'd all have to have internet access and an internet device to go with it. I guess obama and his "free" cell phones take care of that. The scam artists are drooling, everything delivered electronically can be manipulated, which is a GOOD thing for the Left and those who talk with wads of gum stuck to their tongues. Bad for the nation. It is NOT a good idea.
Maybe they could trot out Sandra Fluke to say she needs to vote online to permit her fair share of convenience while having sex at university? Maybe they could tie this into obamas perpetual fundraising machinery, he's already snooping on you for political purposes. Maybe then obama would win a state that has voter id laws too?
Yes, they verify that a person exists on the voter rolls as a valid registered voter and that agrees w/ the name on the email but.... How do they verify that the person on the other end of the email is truly the person for whom the application was submitted? Let's say I know Granny died last week. And now some scammer sets up a fake email account on Yahoo in her name. And no, I'm not suggesting it's a family member I'm pointing out that w/ the system described anybody w/ access to the Obits could set this up and vote an unlimited number of times. Heck, with internet Obits they don't even have to be in the same city or state. A scammer in Cleveland could vote for a bunch of dead people in Salt Lake City. This has the potential to be rife w/ fraud. They're going have to do a lot better locking this down and explaining it before most thinking people buy into it.
Security and auditability are huge problems with any form of online voting. There would need to be significant and as yet unforeseen technogical advances to convince computer technologists that e-mail voting or another form of online voting could be secure enough for public elections. Prof. Ron Rivest, the R in RSA encryption, put it best when asked about voting system vendors who claim to have solved the Internet voting problem: “If they’ve really solved the Internet security and cyber security problem, what are they doing implementing voting systems? They should be working with the Department of Defense or financial industry.” https://www.verifiedvoting.org/statement-on-the-dangers-of-internet-voting-in-public-elections/