Government Technology

Texas Officials Await IBM Response to Data Center Contract Warning



July 27, 2010 By

Texas IT officials are hoping for the best and preparing for the worst after giving IBM 30 days to fix alleged problems with the state's $863 million data center outsourcing contract.

Texas CIO Karen Robinson sent a seven-page "notice to cure" to IBM on July 16 asserting that the company had abandoned it obligations under the seven-year contract signed in 2006. The notice gave IBM 30 days to fix the shortcomings, or face potential termination of the agreement.

In an interview with Government Technology last week, Robinson and a key deputy said they're optimistic that Texas and IBM can resolve their differences. But they're also making contingency plans if the massive data center consolidation and privatization deal falls apart.

"One option we're looking at is breaking up the pieces of services that are currently being provided and going to market and sourcing them through a number of different vendors," said Ed Swedberg, deputy executive director for the Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR). "But I want to make it very clear that we have not made that decision. And we are giving IBM the full opportunity, as per contract, to fulfill their obligations and to respond to the cure notice."

IBM spokesman Jeff Tieszen said on Tuesday, July 27, that the company would respond to the notice "in an appropriate and timely manner." But he reiterated the company's position that it has met all of its contract obligations. "We disagree with what we believe are unfounded accusations of material contract breaches," he said. "And we disagree that they [the DIR] have the ability to terminate the contract for cause."

The DIR contends that IBM has missed critical deadlines due to poor performance and underinvestment in the project. In addition, the agency says the company has been removing its personnel from consolidation activities since last fall and has withdrawn from planning activities associated with the project. IBM says it's living up to the terms of the contract, but that progress on the massive project has been continually hampered due to poor management by the state.

Frustrating Negotiations

The troubled consolidation plan envisions moving IT operations for 27 Texas state agencies into two new data centers that would be operated by IBM. Transfer of servers from agencies to IBM was supposed to be finished in December 2009, but is less than 12 percent complete, according to the DIR. Just five agencies are completely consolidated, and consolidation efforts are under way in only five more, the department said.

The DIR has tried to negotiate changes to the IBM agreement since late last year, based on recommendations made by outsourcing consultants EquaTerra, according to Robinson. State officials reached an agreement in principle with IBM in December, which included a series of steps designed to speed up the privatization of state servers, prioritize consolidation activities and reduce costs to agencies. But progress stalled on formalizing the plan.

"We've been trying to work through some resolutions for the past nine months," Robinson said. "We continued working closely with IBM to resolve some of those outstanding issues. And their performance continued to degrade and we weren't getting what we expected from them."

The EquaTerra report, commissioned by the DIR and released in November 2009, called the existing agreement between Texas and IBM "unsustainable" and recommended a series of revisions. The report criticized the contract's service offerings, characterizing them as "a one-size-fits-all solution" that doesn't meet the diverse business needs of state agencies. In addition, the consultants said governance provisions spelled out in the contract were ineffective and inappropriate for keeping the massive outsourcing deal on track.

IBM's Tieszen said efforts to formally change the outsourcing agreement "didn't get anywhere, primarily because it came down to the DIR making some unreasonable demands of IBM without


You may use or reference this story with attribution and a link to
http://www.govtech.com/pcio/Texas-Officials-Await-IBM-Response-to.html


| More

Comments

Anonymous    |    Commented July 28, 2010

You are a moronic fool Swedberg. The 'datacenter' is all but dead, and you're just too stupid to realize it. You deserve the embarrassment that you will receive as a result of your stupidity involving this contract.

As for the state IT workers, they are, for the most part a technically savvy group. IBM has most of them now. IBM cannibalized a ton of the IT resources at the beginning of this contract when they were 're-badged' as IBM employees, as per the contract. The first of many BRILLIANT moves by Swedberg and his cronies. Let's give all the IT resources of the state away for free. Sounds great! However, the other, shrewd state agencies that were to be affected by this contract were on to DIR's maneuvering on this front and hid (as IBM has claimed) some of the more valuable IT resources knowing that they would need that key staff to keep the ships afloat if/when the contract failed.

This contract was doomed from the start and there is plenty of blame to put around. The Texas Legislature for getting involved is such things from the start, DIR has been awful early and often, and IBM has been more of a late-comer to the blame party.

Anonymous    |    Commented July 28, 2010

You are a moronic fool Swedberg. The 'datacenter' is all but dead, and you're just too stupid to realize it. You deserve the embarrassment that you will receive as a result of your stupidity involving this contract.

As for the state IT workers, they are, for the most part a technically savvy group. IBM has most of them now. IBM cannibalized a ton of the IT resources at the beginning of this contract when they were 're-badged' as IBM employees, as per the contract. The first of many BRILLIANT moves by Swedberg and his cronies. Let's give all the IT resources of the state away for free. Sounds great! However, the other, shrewd state agencies that were to be affected by this contract were on to DIR's maneuvering on this front and hid (as IBM has claimed) some of the more valuable IT resources knowing that they would need that key staff to keep the ships afloat if/when the contract failed.

This contract was doomed from the start and there is plenty of blame to put around. The Texas Legislature for getting involved is such things from the start, DIR has been awful early and often, and IBM has been more of a late-comer to the blame party.

Art    |    Commented July 30, 2010

Maybe the good folks of Texas should have checked with the folks in the Hudson Valley in NY. Big Blue could care less about the US and has gone as far as to develop software that tells them how to maximize tax breaks while maximizing off-shoring of jobs. NY has lost millions, plus thousands of jobs thanks to these pieces of garbage.

Art    |    Commented July 30, 2010

Maybe the good folks of Texas should have checked with the folks in the Hudson Valley in NY. Big Blue could care less about the US and has gone as far as to develop software that tells them how to maximize tax breaks while maximizing off-shoring of jobs. NY has lost millions, plus thousands of jobs thanks to these pieces of garbage.


Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. We reserve the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.


Collaboration for the Public Sector



Collaborative Justice: Transforming Criminal Justice Services Through Unified Collaboration
This issue brief examines video collaboration in every stage of the human justice process, demonstrating how this technology can not only make services more efficient, affordable, and accessible.

Cloud-Based Services Accelerate Public Sector Adoption of Video Collaboration
Today, thanks to new cloud technologies and high-quality networks, mobile video services - which provide not only cost savings but which help governmental interactions become more efficient - are more feasible than ever before.

Modernization as a Service: Acquiring IT through Innovative Procurement

Five Ways Collaboration is Driving Government Performance

Mobile Video Collaboration: The New Business Reality