IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

As Crop Spreads, Accela Announces Hemp Licensing Software

Anticipating a wave of interest in what has become a rapidly growing market across the country, the cloud software company has added hemp licensing to its suite of cannabis regulation tools.

In the agricultural community, hemp is trending. The national advocacy group Vote Hemp said the crop’s acreage across 23 states more than tripled from 2017 to 2018, and the number of state-issued licenses more than doubled in that time. A report this month by Grand View Research projects the industrial hemp market will reach $10.6 billion by 2025.

By removing hemp from the federal list of controlled substances, the 2018 Farm Bill opened the floodgates in all 50 states for cultivation and processing of everything from hemp clothing to paper, biofuel, construction and packaging materials. It has also prompted cloud-software giant Accela to devise a new hemp licensing SaaS, announced today in anticipation of heavy interest in the burgeoning market.

As a standalone product or part of Accela’s Civic Solution for Cannabis Regulation launched in 2017, the Hemp Licensing tool proposes to help states simplify applications, renewals, payments, mapping and other facets of the process, while adhering to either the federal government's regulations or the state's. Accela’s Vice President of Strategic Solutions Greg Felix emphasized that, much less than creating a free-for-all industry, the new farm bill requires state departments to either submit a regulation plan for approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or accept the USDA’s regulations.

For this reason, Felix said the new hemp-licensing software was designed with input from government officials particularly in the South, Southwest and Canada, who have been negotiating hemp licenses for years.

“It will be a heavily regulated market, where state and federal agricultural departments need to work closely together to regulate hemp cultivation and production at the state level,” he said. “What we wanted is the biggest possible view of all the possible scenarios that would be required: record types, the word-flow automation that needs to be in place, the kinds of reports that need to auto-generate, the communication that needs to occur between businesses and the state … so we can come to a jurisdiction or state and say, ‘Why would you reinvent the wheel when we have this content, these assets, ready to go for you to deploy?’”

Felix counted nine state governments with a regulatory framework in place so far: Louisiana, Nebraska, Arizona, Iowa, Connecticut, Georgia, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Wyoming. But setting up a regulatory framework is one thing, he said; implementing it, installing software and accepting applications is another.

Other licensing companies have seen the opportunity, too. One of the govtech industry’s biggest software companies, NIC Inc., acquired the cannabis- and hemp-regulation platform Complia last month, and companies such as BioTrackTHC have been offering software to monitor regulatory compliance for years.

But Felix touted Accela’s experience with its Civic Cannabis solution — which has had nine implementations so far, including California, Michigan and Nevada state governments, and the city of Los Angeles — as helpful groundwork for hemp licensing, and said Accela’s is the only tool he’s aware of that is prepared to scale with demand.

“When a state goes medical cannabis, the program generally starts very small. … When that expands, that’s when the product’s technology stack really gets tested,” he said. “We’re starting to see expansion of medical programs, and then where it really goes logarithmic is when that same state goes recreational. We have built our solution with that endpoint in mind: They need to start with hemp, maybe they stand up a medical program, then that program expands, then by ballot measure, they go to recreational. You need a system that can handle that, all the way along.”

Andrew Westrope is managing editor of the Center for Digital Education. Before that, he was a staff writer for Government Technology, and previously was a reporter and editor at community newspapers. He has a bachelor’s degree in physiology from Michigan State University and lives in Northern California.
Special Projects
Sponsored Articles
  • How the State of Washington teamed with Deloitte to move to a Red Hat footprint within 100 days.
  • The State of Michigan’s Department of Technology, Management, and Budget (DTMB) reduced its application delivery times to get digital services to citizens faster.

  • Sponsored
    Like many governments worldwide, the City and County of Denver, Colorado, had to act quickly to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. To support more than 15,000 employees working from home, the government sought to adapt its new collaboration tool, Microsoft Teams. By automating provisioning and scaling tasks with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, an agentless, human-readable automation tool, Denver supported 514% growth in Teams use and quickly launched a virtual emergency operations center (EOC) for government leaders to respond to the pandemic.
  • Sponsored
    Microsoft Teams quickly became the business application of choice as state and local governments raced to equip remote teams and maintain business continuity during the COVID-19 lockdown. But in the rush to deploy Teams, many organizations overlook, ignore or fail to anticipate some of the administrative hurdles to successful adoption. As more organizations have matured their use of Teams, a set of lessons learned has emerged to help agencies ensure a successful Teams rollout – or correct course on existing implementations.