IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Quote: Disaster resilience is asymmetric

I look forward to getting some feedback on the basic concept I set out below.

“Disaster resilience is asymmetric.  There are no cookie cutter approaches to becoming more disaster resilient.”  Eric Holdeman  I am in the process of writing my Eric’s Corner Column for the March-April edition of Emergency Management Magazine.  The topic will be on Asymmetric Disaster Resilience.

 

Resilience is not easily defined nor executed.  It is the combination of many factors and actions by multiple individuals and groups.  Typically it is not a number one priority for any institution or government, yet taken as a whole the investments in resilience pays huge dividends when disasters do strike. 

 

Resilience is asymmetric because the path to resilience is not predefined.  It has many shapes and sizes, defined by all the actions taken, or not taken, by people and institutions as they make their choices in building and designing for the future.  One thing is certain, real resilience is not defined by what you do at the time of the disaster, but what you have done in preparing in advance for events and circumstances that we wish on no one.  

Eric Holdeman is a contributing writer for Emergency Management magazine and is the former director of the King County, Wash., Office of Emergency Management.
Sign up for GovTech Today

Delivered daily to your inbox to stay on top of the latest state & local government technology trends.