IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Judge Grants Injunction Against Provider of Bogus Spyware Removal Tool

Bogus scan for spyware removes legitimate programs from users' computers

The Federal Trade Commission won an injunction against a Houston, Texas-based company for making false claims of removing spyware from consumers' computers. A judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted the injunction against Trustsoft and the company's principal Danilo Ladendorf to stop the company from using deceptive marketing and illegal unsolicited electronic mail to get consumers to pay for a program that in fact removed legitimate programs such as word processors and antivirus software.

The FTC alleged Trustsoft aggressively and deceptively marketed its SpyKiller application using the Web sites of affiliates, banner and pop-up ads and spam in order to capitalize on legitimate consumer concerns about spyware and induce consumers to download the anti-spyware product.

According to the FTC's complaint filed with the district court, Trustsoft sent pop-up and e-mail messages informing consumers that their computers had been remotely "scanned" and that spyware had been "detected" even though defendants had not performed any such scans. And the company's marketing materials urged consumers to access the SpyKiller Web site to get a "free scan" for spyware.

While the SpyKiller "scan" was running, the program displayed a status report entitled "Spyware Found on your PC:" that included a category called "Live Spyware Processes." According to the FTC's complaint, the software deceptively identified anti-virus programs, word processing programs, or any of the processes running on the system as spyware.

Then, even though the "scan" itself was free, consumers had to pay roughly $39.95 to remove the programs falsely labeled as spyware. Defendants promised in their marketing materials that SpyKiller would find and remove "all" spyware, including "all traces" of particular spyware on consumers' computers. However, the complaint alleges the software failed to remove significant amounts of spyware, including specified spyware defendants claimed on their Web site to remove. The agency alleges that the deceptive claims violate the FTC Act.
In addition, the filing said the company sent spam promoting the SpyKiller software which contained similar deceptive claims, failed to identify themselves as advertising, used false "from" lines, gave no valid postal addresses, and failed to provide consumers with notice of and the ability to "opt-out," in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act.

The court entered a temporary restraining order on June 1, 2005, and a stipulated preliminary injunction order on June 14, 2005. The agency is seeking a permanent ban on the deceptive claims and will ask the court to order consumer redress from defendants Trustsoft Inc. and its Houston, Texas-based principal, Danilo Ladendorf.