IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

APCO Concerned by FCC VoIP Decision

"The FCC's decision does not protect public safety's concerns that the quality of E9-1-1 service be maintained," said APCO President Greg Ballentine

Last week the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International expressed their concerns with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) action to preempt states from regulating Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service.

The decision, which was sparked from a petition from Vonage Holdings Corp. seeking federal preemption on their product DigitalVoice, was Internet telephony service and other IP-enabled services are not subject to traditional public utility regulations.

On November 2, APCO International sent a letter to the FCC stating their concerns with the FCC's upcoming decision. The letter expressed the need for states to retain the authority to impose 9-1-1 surcharges on all telephone services that provide access to 9-1-1. In addition, APCO International stated that state regulations requiring that VoIP providers offer E9-1-1 capability should not be preempted.

"While effective national regulation to ensure VoIP/E9-1-1 capability may be preferable to inconsistent state regulation, states should not be prevented from taking innovative steps to protect their citizens in the absence of federal action," the letter from APCO International President Greg Ballentine said. "Rather than preempt states, the Commission should use this opportunity to take the lead and adopt meaningful rules to ensure that all interconnected VoIP services provide full E9-1-1 capability."

"The FCC's decision does not protect public safety's concerns that the quality of E9-1-1 service be maintained," Ballentine stated. "APCO International applauds the Commissioners for recognizing 9-1-1 as an important issue and encourages them to act to protect public safety in their future order."