With all the problems CIOs face, along comes one that could
be truly disruptive. According to a recent report from the
Yankee Group, "consumerization
threatens to shake a fundamental tenet of technology: central control." The
report,
Zen and the Art of Rogue Employee
Management, is written by Josh Holbrook and was released by the Yankee
Group in July.
Rogue employees with consumer technology and devices that
enhance productivity and balance work and family life are inserting them into
the organizational IT enterprise. The problems range from the simple -- business
cell phones used for personal calls -- to the more aggressive -- IM software,
Skype, as well as cheap BlackBerry devices, applications and services that
workers purchase through consumer channels but then use for business purposes.
Yankee Group's research found that employees feel
"empowered to introduce consumer services into the workplace, and they are
making liberal use of the opportunity." A survey found 31 percent of users
feel they have complete control as far as adding desktop applications. Only 13
percent said their IT department has complete control over the situation.
The trend appears to be growing and could disrupt IT if not
brought under control. "Consumerization creates a new burden that can
potentially cripple already fragile IT organizations. IT departments struggle
to support and maintain an increasingly complex IT environment. Supporting and
monitoring, or identifying and eliminating, consumer services and devices in
the corporate environment will push IT departments over the brink."
The problem is that while CIOs and their IT departments want
to spend more time optimizing IT (50 percent), they actually spend far less
time on this important strategy (25 percent). Instead, CIOs and their staff
spend more time maintaining the IT environment "than any other
activity," according to Holbrook.
The report contends that the introduction of consumer
technology into the workplace will only make a complicated situation worse. At
the same time, companies such as Google, Skype and Second Life are innovating their
consumer products and introducing services "that increasingly expose the
corporation to greater integration and security threats."
The response of CIOs comes in three forms:
- Seek
and destroy. The easiest reaction is to slap an outright ban on devices,
such as USB thumb drives. But like Prohibition, bans are doomed to fail.
- Solicit
and support. Instead of banning, some IT departments try to embrace early
adopters who bring consumer IT into the workplace. But this approach is
also doomed to fail because IT staff will face a "torrent of support
calls."
- Acknowledge
and ignore. This is the mostly widely adopted approach and possibly the
most disruptive, according to the report.
The fourth way to deal with the problem is to take a
"Zen-like acceptance of consumerization. In this model, end-users are not
left to fend for themselves, but rather are provided tools by IT that strike a
balance between end-user and IT-supported applications and devices."
The basic tenets of the Zen approach include:
- Don't
dictate policy and enforce standards.
- Set
guidelines and steer users in the "right" direction.
- Let
the students become the teachers.
- Use
tools, such as social networks, wikis, blogs and tagging.
The result can be an environment where workers self-service
their needs or support their colleagues, rather than put the expectations and
responsibilities solely on the IT department. Not only can self-service
save IT
sanity, but also time and money for the organization. Examples cited include
how an organization enabled employees and managers to do "virtually
everything related to human resources on a self-service basis."
Private-sector companies that use a Zen approach include
Verizon and IBM. But self-service programs require good planning; otherwise the
utilization of self-service tools -- so-called "care co-op tools" -- can
be low, minimizing their impact on the organization.
Another issue with running a self-service environment for
employees is security. The best policy and approach require a mix of good rules
and flexibility.
So how much of the Zen approach would work in government?
Holbrook points out that many governments "are hypersensitive about
controlling their IT environment," and he adds that self-service and
community-based applications are a radical change for many organizations.
Overall, the adoption of Zen techniques in government IT may
take a while.
Tod Newcombe, editor