IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Improving Open Government Outcomes

The University of Albany’s Center for Technology in Government wants to develop tools that will help the public sector leverage open government.

Most public-sector officials are quite familiar with the movement toward increased transparency in government operations, known as the “open government” movement. Most could also probably rattle off a list of the kinds of data now commonly being published for public consumption.

But the Center for Technology in Government (CTG) at the University of Albany, in conjunction with international software company SAP, wants to develop tools for the public sector that will help it leverage open government to improve relationships within government, and between government, community groups and citizens.

"Government's ability to develop appropriate policies and practices to make the best use of information lags behind the rapidly increasing power of information technologies," said CTG Director Theresa Pardo in a news release. "This project will contribute to the development of better research, consulting and government practice models to address the policy, technology and management challenges in our increasingly computational and data-intensive world."

The CTG recently hosted a group of international experts representing the public sector, education and business to contribute to the discussion, and provide feedback on its recently released white paper, titled Modeling the Informational Relationships between Government and Society. The draft paper will be revised based on feedback and other information gathered during the June workshop.

The CTG’s analysis considered the case of New York City’s website that was created to put restaurant inspection reports directly in the hands of Manhattan diners. An early open government effort that started in 1999, it brought together diverse stakeholder groups with an interest in the information.

CTG Senior Program Associate Natalie Helbig explained the inclusion of the New York City case study this way: “The information relationships between government, restaurant inspectors, the restaurant operators, citizens and mobile app developers, changed in complex ways that have led to greater openness, transparency and accuracy of information.”

More information on the Center for Technology in Government’s Open Government Thought Leadership Program is available here.
 

Special Projects
Sponsored Articles
  • How the State of Washington teamed with Deloitte to move to a Red Hat footprint within 100 days.
  • The State of Michigan’s Department of Technology, Management, and Budget (DTMB) reduced its application delivery times to get digital services to citizens faster.

  • Sponsored
    Like many governments worldwide, the City and County of Denver, Colorado, had to act quickly to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. To support more than 15,000 employees working from home, the government sought to adapt its new collaboration tool, Microsoft Teams. By automating provisioning and scaling tasks with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, an agentless, human-readable automation tool, Denver supported 514% growth in Teams use and quickly launched a virtual emergency operations center (EOC) for government leaders to respond to the pandemic.
  • Sponsored
    Microsoft Teams quickly became the business application of choice as state and local governments raced to equip remote teams and maintain business continuity during the COVID-19 lockdown. But in the rush to deploy Teams, many organizations overlook, ignore or fail to anticipate some of the administrative hurdles to successful adoption. As more organizations have matured their use of Teams, a set of lessons learned has emerged to help agencies ensure a successful Teams rollout – or correct course on existing implementations.