IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

There Is NIMBY and Now There Is BANANA

Everyone wants modern conveniences, but no one wants to have the infrastructure that supports them.

Most of us have heard of NIMBY (Not in My Backyard), which alludes to having things like power lines and pipelines being built near neighborhoods or businesses. The other day I heard a new one, BANANA (Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone).

It seems that everyone wants to have electricity for all their personal and business needs, natural gas to heat their homes or gasoline to fuel their cars, trucks and boats, yet no one wants the infrastructure to support the delivery of those essential utilities and supplies that fuel our modern economy.

There is no sense of community! In the city of Bellevue, Wash., the Puget Sound Energy Company wants to add some additional power lines to an existing right-of-way with existing power lines running through it. There is opposition from people who live along that right-of-way.

The conundrum is that the projection is that an additional 1 million people will live in the Central Puget Sound Region in the next 20 years. I expect they will need electricity to sustain themselves and support the existing population. I'm wondering if those opposing the addition of the power lines will be willing to put up with rolling brownouts when the power needs exceed the capacity to deliver electrical power to the region?

It is a zero sum game. it is not hard to figure out that at some point in the future the existing power supply network will not be able to meet the growing demand. I guess we'll need a crisis to act — per our normal approach to getting things done here in the United States.

Eric Holdeman is a contributing writer for Emergency Management magazine and is the former director of the King County, Wash., Office of Emergency Management.
Special Projects
Sponsored Articles
  • How the State of Washington teamed with Deloitte to move to a Red Hat footprint within 100 days.
  • The State of Michigan’s Department of Technology, Management, and Budget (DTMB) reduced its application delivery times to get digital services to citizens faster.

  • Sponsored
    Like many governments worldwide, the City and County of Denver, Colorado, had to act quickly to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. To support more than 15,000 employees working from home, the government sought to adapt its new collaboration tool, Microsoft Teams. By automating provisioning and scaling tasks with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, an agentless, human-readable automation tool, Denver supported 514% growth in Teams use and quickly launched a virtual emergency operations center (EOC) for government leaders to respond to the pandemic.
  • Sponsored
    Microsoft Teams quickly became the business application of choice as state and local governments raced to equip remote teams and maintain business continuity during the COVID-19 lockdown. But in the rush to deploy Teams, many organizations overlook, ignore or fail to anticipate some of the administrative hurdles to successful adoption. As more organizations have matured their use of Teams, a set of lessons learned has emerged to help agencies ensure a successful Teams rollout – or correct course on existing implementations.