The New York Times has this editorial remembering Oso, but also detailing how we can't seem to get motivated to spend the time and money to map the risks, How to Make Landslides Less Deadly.
I believe the bottom line for why we don't map landslide risk areas is because people don't want to know about the risk and be confronted with the facts. Some of those reasons include:
- My property may be devalued by having it designated as an area of risk.
- I want to live where I live worry free. Not knowing is comforting.
- The economic well-being of the community will be impacted if we document these risks.
- People have lived here for decades and never had a problem, don't start stirring up trouble.
- This is hocus pocus science. Don't tell me where I can and cannot live because you think something might happen.
Claire Rubin shared the link above.