There isn't anything there that I disagree with at all. Some tidbits include:
- When the entire nation is impacted, there isn't any mutual aid coming to the rescue. I'd add that is also true for your "immediate" mutual aid resources in a regional disaster. Help will come for those, but it will take some time to arrive.
- They see private resources as a way to quickly augment government capabilities. Sounds self-serving, but that is how it is playing out right now.
- They didn't say it this way, but public health needs our help in coordinating large-scale responses.
- It is not just floods and fires that draw emergency managers into the fray. The coordination capabilities that we possess have been noticed and we will be called upon more frequently for a much wider diversity of issues. I've seen this play out extensively in the city of Seattle.
- Climate and the new Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program that has a mitigation emphasis are made for one another.
- Community resilience beyond physical disaster impacts has an economic and financial connection. The wellbeing of the general population of a community is in play.
- Cybersecurity is only going to get to be more important as we move forward, and emergency management has a role to play.
In summary — business is good and looking up!