Interactive Map: Rating the States
Alabama | Alaska | Arizona | Arkansas | California | Colorado | Connecticut | Delaware
Florida | Georgia | Hawaii | Idaho | Illinois | Indiana | Iowa | Kansas | Kentucky | Louisiana
Maine | Maryland | Massachusetts | Michigan | Minnesota | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana
Nebraska | Nevada | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New Mexico | New York | North Carolina
North Dakota | Ohio | Oklahoma | Oregon | Pennsylvania | Rhode Island | South Carolina
South Dakota | Tennessee | Texas | Utah | Vermont | Virginia |
Washington
Washington, D.C. | West Virginia | Wisconsin | Wyoming
To keep the click count high, more Web sites are offering users a mobile version of existing sites. Due to phones' small screens, cumbersome interface and differing speeds, these mobile sites, often at a URL such as http://m.sitename.com or http://www.sitename.mobi, typically display fewer and lower-resolution graphics and feature hyperlinks to only the most pertinent information. YouTube, for example, has a mobile site at http://m.youtube.com that serves up videos to users on BlackBerrys and iPhones. BlackBerrys and iPhones don't support Flash, the standard video format YouTube uses. So the mobile site streams videos in Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP), a format both phones do support.
YouTube is just one example of a popular Web site optimized for the mobile user. Google, Yahoo, Facebook and countless others have also optimized their sites. So how has this movement to mobility changed state government Web sites? That's the question Government Technology sought to investigate. In our test, we visited every state Web site on both a desktop PC and a BlackBerry Curve to see which sites were best for smartphone browsing. State sites were graded using an A, B, C, D, F scale. These grades don't reflect an evaluation of any site were it to be visited on a PC or laptop. The grades apply strictly to how the sites function on a BlackBerry Curve.