IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

How Cars Help Fuel Municipal Budgets

A look into a key source of revenue for local government.

States and the federal government have the income tax to help pay for things. They tax traded goods, business activity, investment earnings and more.

Cities have shallower pools of money to draw from. As a recent analysis from Governing* magazine shows, one common place local governments look to find revenue is motor vehicles.

In fact, cities collected about $5 billion in revenue related to vehicles in fiscal year 2016.

For some cities, vehicle-related money is just one of many ways to fund the budget. If vehicle revenues decline for some reason, it won’t be too big an issue. But for many smaller municipalities, that money is a huge chunk of the budget, and any losses will hurt their ability to pay for things. Governing found that in some small towns, parking payments and legal fees related to vehicles alone made up more than half of the city’s revenues.

Tech companies have found several ways to help local governments in this space. Many companies focused on digital payments provide tools for governments to accept parking ticket payments and other fees online, leading to faster payments. Others have created smart parking meters and companion phone apps that allow people to pay for parking more easily or even create dynamic pricing.

As important as those revenues are to cities, they might be in trouble in the future. That’s because self-driving vehicles, which many companies are planning to roll out in the next three or four years, have the potential to change the way people use vehicles. If people choose to hail rides from driverless cars, there will be no reasons for those cars to wait around when they drop the passenger off — so there will be no need to pay for parking. And if they drive more safely than humans, there will be no reason for police officers to issue tickets.

*Governing is a part of e.Republic, Government Technology's parent company.

Ben Miller is the associate editor of data and business for Government Technology. His reporting experience includes breaking news, business, community features and technical subjects. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in journalism from the Reynolds School of Journalism at the University of Nevada, Reno, and lives in Sacramento, Calif.
Special Projects
Sponsored Articles
  • How the State of Washington teamed with Deloitte to move to a Red Hat footprint within 100 days.
  • The State of Michigan’s Department of Technology, Management, and Budget (DTMB) reduced its application delivery times to get digital services to citizens faster.

  • Sponsored
    Like many governments worldwide, the City and County of Denver, Colorado, had to act quickly to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. To support more than 15,000 employees working from home, the government sought to adapt its new collaboration tool, Microsoft Teams. By automating provisioning and scaling tasks with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, an agentless, human-readable automation tool, Denver supported 514% growth in Teams use and quickly launched a virtual emergency operations center (EOC) for government leaders to respond to the pandemic.
  • Sponsored
    Microsoft Teams quickly became the business application of choice as state and local governments raced to equip remote teams and maintain business continuity during the COVID-19 lockdown. But in the rush to deploy Teams, many organizations overlook, ignore or fail to anticipate some of the administrative hurdles to successful adoption. As more organizations have matured their use of Teams, a set of lessons learned has emerged to help agencies ensure a successful Teams rollout – or correct course on existing implementations.