Rural NY Officials Have Issues With State Broadband Plan

Phase III of New York's broadband plan was supposed to help rural communities connect to the Internet, but the state's board of supervisors is less than impressed, and in Hampton, 260 units have no accessibility.

by Kathleen Phalen-Tomaselli, The Post Star / December 28, 2018

(TNS) — Some county homes and businesses have been left out of the state of New York's broadband-for-all plan or their new service is spotty at best, said Hampton Supervisor David O’Brien during Friday’s Washington County Board of Supervisor’s meeting.

“Some communities have been left out in the process,” O’Brien said to Assemblywoman Carrie Woerner, D-Round Lake, who met with the supervisors during Friday’s meeting. Woerner asked if supervisors had any questions about the governor’s agenda.

“Are there other ways to get funding to fill in this (broadband) gap?” O’Brien asked.

Woerner agreed with O’Brien and others that the broadband roll-out has not been ideal.

“The broadband (plan) implied everyone was going to (fiber-optic cable), instead it has been a mix of some fiber, but mostly wireless broadband,” she said. “The quality of providers varies and along with the geography.”

Woerner said officials will have an opportunity to question the agencies awarded state broadband contracts and she will “continue to hold them accountable.”

The state broadband initiative, New NY Broadband, got rolling in 2015 when Gov. Andrew Cuomo approved $500 million in state funding to achieve statewide broadband access by 2018. At the time, 35 percent of New York households did not have service.

Phase III rolled out in January with a focus on rural and remote areas like Washington County. The county was awarded a state grant of $21,132,571. Of that, Hampton got $653,605 for 385 households.

According to O’Brien, 153 units are slated to get fiber broadband within the next year with Slic Network Solutions, and 232 units got satellite connections with Hughes Networks instead of fiber, leaving about 260 remaining with no service.

“I recognize Internet service is not (an) optional thing, everybody needs it,” Woerner said.

O’Brien replied, “Our residents expected this and want to know, ‘How come I’m not getting this?’”

“You are not the only person to raise this issue,” Woerner said, adding that what they would get was misrepresented and that there was a failure by some to deliver quality service.

“The (state) spent a lot of money for inadequate service,” she said.

Laura Oswald, director of Washington County Economic Development, said the implementation of high-speed Internet and fiber didn’t turn out to be cost-effective.

“They solved the cost problem with Hughes Net,” she said. “For some, there was no other option. Is it ideal? No. It’s better than dial-up, but we still have a ways to go. But we are much better off than we were, yes.”

©2018 The Post Star (Glens Falls, N.Y.). Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.