IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Building Disaster Resiliency Takes Courage

Putting things back the way they were is the easy way out.

The easiest path to disaster recovery is to rebuild just as it was before the disaster.  Everyone likes that solution.  It works for Federal bureaucrats, insurance companies, businesses and individuals.  People just want it put back the "way it was" because that is what they know--and it is faster to do so.

 

If you want to build a more disaster resilient community you will need to take a different path.  See the article 3 Cities That Used Disaster to Revitalize Their Future  It describes how communities from very small, to medium size and then a larger metropolitan city made choices that improved their disaster and economic prospects long term.

 

I say it takes courage because I cannot think of another word that better describes the individual trait it will take from elected and senior appointed officials to emerge from the debate and the contentious issues that are sure to arise from delaying a rapid rebuilding process.  It is this type of leadership that makes the difference long term.  

 

The example of Steve Hewitt and the Town of Greensburg is but one example of what it takes.  He had opportunities to leave the city for higher paying jobs, but stayed the course to see the rebuilding process well on its way.  Commitment and persistence might be other words we describe to the personality traits of leaders intent on building future resilience for their communities.

 

Eric Holdeman is a contributing writer for Emergency Management magazine and is the former director of the King County, Wash., Office of Emergency Management.