IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Opinion: The Risk of Teaching Compsci Without Liberal Arts

If students pursue majors in AI within the isolated confines of a college of computing, without the grounding of a broader education, how can we expect them to make wise decisions about how that technology is applied?

Colorful graphic of a lightbulb shaped like a brain
(TNS) — Earlier this week, my colleague Ian Bogost published a provocative article about a trend in higher education: the opening of distinct colleges of computing, akin to law schools. New programs at MIT, Cornell, and soon UC Berkeley follow an uptick in the number of students graduating with computer-science majors. They are serving a growing market.

“When they elevate computing to the status of a college, with departments and a budget, they are declaring it a higher-order domain of knowledge and practice,” Ian writes. “That decision will inform a fundamental question: whether computing ought to be seen as a superfield that lords over all others, or just a servant of other domains, subordinated to their interests and control. This is, by no happenstance, also the basic question about computing in our society writ large.”

This talk of subordination naturally turned my mind toward AI, a technology that some believe threatens to upend the world as we know it. If students pursue majors in AI within the isolated confines of a college of computing — without the grounding of a broader arts-and-science education — how can we expect them to make wise decisions about how that technology is applied? I asked Ian for his thoughts.

“We generally don’t use computers just for computing — the computing does something,” he told me. “AI is a term without real meaning; in some ways, it’s just a nickname for a certain intensification of automation that’s been ongoing for years. But one of the promises, or threats, of AI is that it can apply computing problem-solving to many more domains, and very effectively. So if computer people do, in fact, know less about everything in the world beyond computing while simultaneously building or applying AI to many more problem spaces, and faster, too, then that seems like it could be quite concerning indeed.”

But the risk, such as it is, extends in two directions. The “computer people” might be missing out on the liberal arts, but so, too, are the liberal-arts people missing out on computer science. “If people with domain expertise insist on simply resisting AI as an unwelcome incursion, one that can be fought, they also risk ceding their opportunity to influence how computing might colonize their efforts,” Ian said. “It seems naive to think that it just won’t, that the ‘enemy’ can be held off at the gates forever — or even that it’s an enemy you’d want to hold off.”


I spotted a new Coca-Cola flavor at the grocery store earlier this week — “raspberry spiced” — and had a flashback to September, when the company unveiled a formula that was purportedly made with the help of artificial intelligence. “It smells like circus-peanut candies and tastes mostly like Coke,” my colleague Kaitlyn Tiffany wrote at the time. Bottoms up.

©2024 The Atlantic Monthly Group. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.