IE 11 Not Supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Audit of Oregon's Emergency Management System Finds Issues

Will this audit's findings make a difference?

If you got a phone call informing you that your program was going to be audited, how would you feel about it?  Run for the hills? Think, OK this is an opportunity?

I don't know what the Oregon Emergency Management staff was thinking, but they did have an audit. The title of the audit is a good summary of the findings, The state Must Do More to Prepare Oregon for a Catastrophic Disaster.

I did take the time to read through the entire audit. Beside looking at the actual Office of Emergency Management (OEM), they took a systems approach and also looked at state agencies and city and county capabilities.

Staffing for OEM was called out as a major issue. Fortunately, emergency management has made requests for additional staffing for a number of years and has not gotten the positions they have asked for. In Washington state, I remember being told--don't ask for anything.

It will be interesting if the audit makes a difference. There can be plenty of recommendations that are never accepted and acted upon. Much of Oregon's issue is a lack of resources. Unless they start printing money, they will have to depend on the legislature to step up and make changes.

Eric Holdeman is a contributing writer for Emergency Management magazine and is the former director of the King County, Wash., Office of Emergency Management.